Febina Mathew, professor and soybean pathologist, North Dakota State University

Follow @febina_m on X. Photo courtesy of Grand Farm.

Febina Mathew is a professor and soybean pathologist in the Department of Plant Pathology, Microbiology and Biotechnology at North Dakota State University (NDSU). Originally from India, she holds an M.S. and PhD in Plant Pathology from NDSU. She lives in Fargo, North Dakota.

Where did you work before NDSU?

I was an assistant professor and field crops pathologist, and later an associate professor, at South Dakota State University.

Tell us a bit about what you’re working on at NDSU.

My research program focuses on understanding the biology of pathogens affecting soybeans and their interactions with host plants, with the goal of developing effective disease management strategies, particularly through fungicides (foliar and seed treatments) and host resistance. My soybean research focuses primarily on Diaporthe diseases, Fusarium diseases (root rot and sudden death syndrome), as well as viruses, Clonostachys and other emerging pathogens affecting soybeans in North Dakota. We also investigate Phomopsis stem canker of sunflower and the potential for pathogen movement between soybean and sunflower.

My research on Diaporthe/Phomopsis species spans 15 years and includes work on both soybean and sunflower, in collaboration with researchers in the U.S. and internationally, including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Italy, Serbia and Slovenia.

In sunflower, Phomopsis stem canker, caused by Diaporthe helianthi and D. gulyae, is an important disease in the U.S. northern Great Plains. In Manitoba, D. gulyae is also known to cause disease. Phomopsis stem canker can cause substantial yield losses, reported to reach up to 40 per cent, and is favoured by prolonged periods of high humidity, wet conditions and temperatures of approximately 20–25°C, particularly from the R1 to R5 growth stages. Disease symptoms become most apparent after flowering when characteristic brown stem lesions develop. As the disease progresses, the stem becomes hollow and weakened, increasing the risk of lodging under the weight of the head. Overall, sunflower yield declines by about 11.6 kg/ha (10.4 lb/acre) for every percentage-point increase in disease severity.

The project, “Determining fungicide effectiveness to manage Phomopsis stem canker,” partially funded by Manitoba Crop Alliance, analyzed 80 fungicide trials conducted from 2009 to 2025. These trials were conducted across 80 location-years in Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota and evaluated fungicides from several chemical groups for management of Phomopsis stem canker.

A single fungicide application at the R1 growth stage, when the miniature floral head is formed on the sunflower plant, provided the most consistent yield benefit compared with untreated plots. Among the products tested, those containing pyraclostrobin reduced disease severity by more than 30 per cent and increased yield by at least five per cent.

The economic benefit of fungicide application was greatest when disease pressure was high. In individual trials, a single pyraclostrobin application increased yield by 543 to 842 lb/acre under high disease pressure, compared with 155 to 343 lb/acre under low or no disease pressure.

Economic analysis showed that a pyraclostrobin application costing approximately $13.27/acre would require about 112 lb/acre of additional yield for oilseed sunflower or 88 lb/acre for confection sunflower to break even at the 2025 prices used in the study.

What does this mean for farmers in Manitoba?

For Manitoba sunflower farmers, the study provides useful guidance, although the fungicide trials were conducted primarily in the U.S. northern Great Plains. The main message is that fungicides are most likely to provide an economic benefit when disease pressure is high and yield is being limited by the disease, rather than simply applying a fungicide in every field.

Farmers should also consider an integrated approach to manage Phomopsis stem canker, which involves the use of disease-tolerant hybrids where available and crop rotation. Sunflower is rotated every three to four years, and crops such as wheat and corn can help reduce pathogen levels in the field. Once the pathogen is established we cannot eliminate it, but we can reduce the amount of pathogen present.

When deciding whether to spray, I would ask: How much disease pressure are we likely to have? Did I see the disease the last time I grew sunflowers? Did my neighbour have it? What did I see in the same variety previously? Then consider the fungicide cost, sunflower price and expected yield to determine whether an application is likely to provide a return on investment.

Who inspired you to get into this area of work?

My former PhD advisor, Dr. Samuel Markell at NDSU, encouraged me to investigate a disease that had re-emerged after being first discovered more than a decade earlier and had initially been considered a minor disease. Not fully understanding why it was re-emerging sparked my curiosity and motivated me to study the disease under his guidance.

What can you say about the value of farmers providing funding and support to your organization?

It’s invaluable; it helps ensure our research addresses the issues that matter most to farmers. My grandfather was a farmer, so if I put myself in his shoes, I know he would be asking, “How much can I invest in protecting my farm and getting the maximum benefit out of it?” That’s what we are trying to answer through our research. We combine pathogen biology with field-based research to find practical solutions for farmers.

How does that farmer funding and support directly benefit farmers?

We are aiming to turn research into practical, affordable solutions that can be used in the field. In this case, funding allows us to evaluate fungicide programs, yield impacts and economic returns under field conditions. That information helps farmers make better-informed decisions about when to spray, which products or modes of action to use and when a fungicide application is likely to provide a positive return.

How do you spend your time outside of work?

I have training in a traditional dance style of India, specifically Bharatanatyam. Following my training, I have been practicing multiple dance styles from India and other countries since the age of four. I continue to practice dance in my free time and occasionally participate in local cultural and charity events. I also enjoy traveling and connecting with people from diverse backgrounds and cultures.

What is the best piece of advice you’ve received?

One of the best pieces of advice I have received came from our department head, Dr. John McEvoy: “Trust your gut. If something does not feel right, even when you cannot quite explain why, it is worth listening to that instinct.” I have not been good at trusting my instincts, but his advice has stayed with me. It has encouraged me to pay closer attention to that inner voice.

What is your favourite food?

My favourite food is tiramisu! I love the combination of the three Cs: coffee, cream and cocoa.

Follow @febina_m on X.

Delegate position available on MCA flax committee – apply today!

Flax growers:

  • Want to help build a strong future for the Manitoba flax industry?
  • Want to contribute your experience and passion for the agriculture industry to a worthy cause?
  • Want to meet likeminded people and have new experiences?

We need you!

Manitoba Crop Alliance is looking to fill one delegate position on its flax committee, starting immediately.

Roles & responsibilities of committee delegates

Who is eligible?

To be eligible to apply, candidates must:

  • Be 18 years or age or older
  • Have grown and marketed flax in Manitoba
  • Have paid check-off fees to the organization in the previous fiscal year (i.e., have not received a refund)

Apply now

Please note, the deadline for applications is 4:30 p.m. CDT on Nov. 4, 2026.

Completed forms can be submitted electronically or by mail/fax.

Email:
pam@mbcropalliance.ca

Mail:
Manitoba Crop Alliance
Box 188
Carman, MB R0G 0J0

Fax:
204-745-6122

For questions, please contact:

Pam de Rocquigny
pam@mbcropalliance.ca
204-750-0217

Delegate position available on MCA sunflower committee – apply today!

Sunflower growers:

  • Want to help build a strong future for the Manitoba sunflower industry?
  • Want to contribute your experience and passion for the agriculture industry to a worthy cause?
  • Want to meet likeminded people and have new experiences?

We need you!

Manitoba Crop Alliance is looking to fill one delegate position on its sunflower committee, starting immediately.

Roles & responsibilities of committee delegates

Who is eligible?

To be eligible to apply, candidates must:

  • Be 18 years or age or older
  • Have grown and marketed sunflower in Manitoba
  • Have paid check-off fees to the organization in the previous fiscal year (i.e., have not received a refund)

Apply now

Please note, the deadline for applications is 4:30 p.m. CDT on Nov. 4, 2026.

Completed forms can be submitted electronically or by mail/fax.

Email:
pam@mbcropalliance.ca

Mail:
Manitoba Crop Alliance
Box 188
Carman, MB R0G 0J0

Fax:
204-745-6122

For questions, please contact:

Pam de Rocquigny
pam@mbcropalliance.ca
204-750-0217

Manitoba Crop Alliance announces results of 2026 crop committee delegate nominations

Oct. 8, 2026 (Carman, MB) – Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) is pleased to announce the results of the nomination process for delegate positions on its four crop committees. The nomination period ran from July 1 to Oct. 1, 2026.

In total, 15 farmer members were nominated for the 17 available delegate positions across the four crop committees and are thereby elected by acclamation. Among those 15 delegates, four are new to their respective committees and 11 are incumbents.

“Our crop committees provide a strong voice for each crop type we represent, while also creating opportunities for collaboration and a cross-commodity approach to the issues all farmers face,” says MCA CEO Pam de Rocquigny.

“I would like to thank all the MCA farmer members who let their names stand for nomination and I look forward to seeing how they will help guide the direction of our industry.”

Corn: Doug Martin (East Selkirk), Jonothan Hodson (Lenore), Warren McCutcheon (Carman) and Joel Doerksen (MacGregor) were nominated for the four available crop committee delegate positions.

Flax: Nick Matheson (Stonewall), Leigh Smith (Oak Lake) and Angela Brackenreed (Justice) were nominated for the four available crop committee delegate positions. One delegate position on this crop committee remains vacant. 

Sunflower: Nathan Tolenaar (Stony Mountain), Darcy Watson (Rossendale) and Brad Anderson (Cypress River) were nominated for the four available crop committee delegate positions. One delegate position on this crop committee remains vacant.

Wheat and Barley: Scott Mowbray (Cartwright), Robert Misko (Roblin), Brad Myskiw (Woodlands), Ryan Hueging (Warren) and Kelvin Rothenburger (Stanley) were nominated for the five available crop committee delegate positions.

The new delegates will join their respective committees in January 2027. MCA is seeking candidates to fill the vacant delegate positions on the flax and sunflower crop committees.

MCA would like to thank outgoing delegates Richard Dureault (corn), Darcy Unger (flax), Eric Fridfinnson (flax), Gregg Fotheringham (sunflower), Mark McDonald (sunflower) and Wilfred Harder (wheat and barley) for their valuable contributions to the organization.

-30-

For more information, please contact:

Pam de Rocquigny
Chief Executive Officer
Manitoba Crop Alliance                                     
204-745-6661
pam@mbcropalliance.ca

About Manitoba Crop Alliance:
MCA represents more than 7,700 farmer members who grow wheat, barley, corn, sunflower and flax in Manitoba. MCA puts its farmer members first and strives to continuously improve their competitiveness and profitability by focusing on four main areas: research, agronomy, market development and access, and communications. By investing in these key areas, MCA ensures wheat, barley, corn, sunflower and flax remain sustainable production choices for Manitoba farmers. For more information, visit mbcropalliance.ca.

Sign up now for our 2026 Corn Yield Competition

Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) is looking for participants for the 2026 Corn Yield Competition! All entrants must be farmer members of MCA.

This year’s competition will be the last in its current form. We would like to thank all our farmer members who have participated during the competition’s 55-year history. Your efforts to strive for bigger and better yields year after year have inspired us and we hope you continue to push those boundaries. Stay tuned, as we have something new in the works that will help farmers continue the quest for corn yield improvement in 2027 and beyond.

Prizes will be awarded as follows at MCA’s 2027 Annual General Meeting, which will be held on Feb. 11 during the CropConnect Conference:

  • 1st Prize – $1,000 and a wall plaque (sponsored by the company with the winning hybrid)
  • 2nd Prize – $500 and a wall plaque
  • 3rd Prize – $300 and a wall plaque
  • 4th and 5th Prize – Receive a wall plaque

Instructions for entering the yield competition

Please review the instructions and keep them in mind as you are scouting for the very best spot in your field. Even if you don’t have your spot(s) picked out, you can still enter early!

For more information or to enter, please contact:

Morgan Cott
Agronomy Extension Specialist – Special Crops
Manitoba Crop Alliance
204-750-2489
morgan@mbcropalliance.ca

We’re Hiring: Summer Research and Extension Assistant

We are seeking a summer-term, full-time Research and Extension Assistant to join our dynamic team and serve our farmer members who grow wheat, barley, corn, sunflower and flax in the province of Manitoba.

The Research and Extension Assistant is responsible for supporting MCA staff and operations through field, administrative, data-management and event work for all MCA activities, under the supervision of the Whole Farm Specialist. This role requires a highly motivated individual with a passion for agriculture, strong communication skills and a positive, team-oriented attitude.

Click here to view the full job posting, including duties and responsibilities, desired qualifications and experience, and working conditions of the position.

To apply, please forward a resume and letter of interest by email to ashley@mbcropalliance.ca. The application deadline for this position is 4:30 p.m. CDT on Oct. 28, 2026.

We thank all applicants for their interest. Only those selected for an interview will be contacted.

Should I bale my wheat straw, or is it worth more left in the field?

By Ashley Ammeter, Whole Farm Specialist, Manitoba Crop Alliance

To give the classic agronomist response: it depends.

Straw has value whether it’s baled or left in the field. How that value is best captured varies from farm to farm and even from field to field. The answer depends on your soil type, moisture conditions, cropping system and long-term management goals.

If you farm clay soils with high organic matter, excess straw may cause management challenges. Heavy crop residues can require additional tillage, delay soil warming and drying in the spring, and interfere with seeding. In these situations, baling straw may be a practical management tool.

On the other hand, on lighter-textured, drought- or erosion-prone soils or those with lower organic matter, the benefits of retaining straw may outweigh any potential income from baling.

Some components of the value of straw are relatively easy to quantify. Straw contains nutrients that are removed from the field when baled and may need to be replaced through fertilizer. Other benefits, such as supplying organic matter, are much harder to put a dollar value on.

Straw contains valuable nutrients

The nutrient content of straw can vary depending on crop type, growing conditions and soil fertility levels. Potassium (K) content can be particularly variable, since the K found in crop residue is highly soluble and will leach from crop residue if there is rainfall before baling.

Typical straw nutrient contents are shown below:

*Note that potassium is often naturally abundant in clay soils, so potassium removal is not always considered a significant concern in clay soils. Source: Manitoba Agriculture Straw Cost Calculator.

Manitoba Agriculture’s Straw Cost Calculator can help determine the value of straw based on the cost of nutrients removed. While the actual nutrient content of straw can vary considerably, calculating an approximate replacement value for the nutrients removed can be a useful starting point.

The value of organic matter

The nutrient value of straw is relatively easy to calculate. The value of the organic matter in straw is much harder to quantify, but may be even more important in the long run.

Soil organic matter is a critical component of soil health that influences many soil properties and plays an important role in crop productivity:

  • Soil moisture regulation: Increased organic matter can improve water infiltration under excess moisture conditions and improve water holding capacity under drought conditions.
  • Soil structure and aggregation: Soil organic matter plays an important role in the formation of stable soil aggregates (soil particles that are bound together). A well-aggregated soil improves water infiltration, root growth and can better resist erosion and compaction.
  • Herbicide breakdown: Soils with low organic matter can have an increased risk of herbicide carryover, particularly under dry conditions. Organic matter provides sites for herbicides to bind to, preventing them from impacting sensitive crops. In addition, soils with high organic matter often have increased microbial activity, speeding up herbicide breakdown.

What does long-term research tell us about straw removal?

Long-term research from Indian Head, SK, suggests that the impact of straw removal depends on how much residue is removed, how often straw removal occurs and the overall management system.

In a study by Lafond et al. (2009), straw was removed two years out of three in a fallow-wheat-wheat rotation over a 50 year period. Depending on the harvest system used, baling removed 26 to 40 per cent of the total aboveground crop residues (other than grain). Despite repeated straw removal, researchers saw no reduction in soil organic carbon and soil organic nitrogen.

They concluded that in medium- and heavy-textured soils, crop residue can be harvested without negatively impacting long-term productivity, provided that less than 40 per cent of residue is removed, that removal happens no more than two years out of three, and that the practice is combined with adequate fertilization and no-till management.

The bottom line

Straw is a valuable resource. It contains nutrients, contributes organic matter and helps protect soils from erosion. At the same time, straw can create management challenges and may have market value.

If you decide to bale straw:

  • Maintain sufficient crop residue and stubble to protect the soil from erosion, and reduce tillage after harvest to preserve residue cover. The Manitoba Agriculture Soil Management Guide recommends maintaining at least 35 per cent crop residue cover after seeding for most soils, and at least 65 per cent cover on soils that are susceptible to wind erosion.
  • Avoid removing straw so frequently that soil organic matter levels decrease.
  • Fertilize crops adequately to replace nutrients removed in the straw and use soil testing to guide fertility decisions.
  • Be especially cautious on low organic matter, drought-prone and erosion-prone soils.

Additional resources

Jeffrey Stobbe-Wiebe, wheat and barley crop committee

Jeffrey (Jeff) Stobbe-Wiebe farms near Springstein, MB, with his dad and brother, Dave and Keenan, at Wiebe Family Farms. He lives with his wife, Miriam, and their young son, Robin. They grow wheat, oats, barley, canola and soybeans.

What motivated you to get into farming?

I grew up on the farm and have been helping out since I was little. I left and became a brewer for a few years at different breweries around Winnipeg then realized I wanted to come back to the farm. Being outside every day is really nice. I like how much work on the farm changes day to day. One day you’re a welder, the next you’re a soil scientist or doing agronomy work. Every day is a little bit different. You also get to drive big tractors, which is always fun too.

What motivated you to get involved with Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA)?

We started a craft malting facility on our farm. We grow barley, we malt it and then sell it to local craft breweries. I work closely with the Canadian Malting Barley Technical Centre (CMBTC) in Winnipeg. They do a lot of field trials and research with MCA. In talking with CMBTC, they suggested I should get involved. As a barley grower and maltster, I’ve got a unique perspective, not just growing barley but also the value-added side. Through their encouragement, I became a delegate, and this year I also became a director.

What benefit do you think being a delegate has brought you?

I was only a delegate for three months before becoming a director, but being a delegate is great. I got to see the process of how MCA works, meet board members on the crop committee and learn more about what they do. It’s a nice way to get involved without having to be on the board or a decision-maker right away. It’s a good way for your voice to be heard while getting a sense of how the organization works and whether it’s a good fit for you.

What does your role on the wheat and barley committee involve?

Delegates are in charge of helping steer the ship a bit in terms of the vision and direction of what MCA is doing. MCA is focused on research, so we help set the direction for wheat and barley research we want to see coming down the pipeline. It’s great to be part of the decisions about where research dollars are spent and what projects we’re looking to fund. It’s good to be involved in the research side of agriculture and to see where your check-off dollars go.

Is there a project, issue or area of work you’re especially proud of being part of as a delegate?

Funding approvals (reviewing research papers) were a bit of a whirlwind. I’m generally proud of the whole process of going through research proposals and choosing where the funding should go. When we put our farm money into something, it’s nice to see the research that comes out of that process.

Why do you think other people should get involved with MCA?

Being involved means actually seeing where the research money is going. If you’re a grower of a certain crop type, this is a way to make sure your voice is heard.

What are you most excited about when it comes to the future of your farm?

Continuing to grow sustainable crops in Manitoba.

Do you have any hobbies outside of farming?

Skateboarding, biking, golf and disc golf.

What’s your go-to field meal during busy seasons?

My mom makes supper for harvest, whatever she’s bringing that day.

What’s one thing people might be surprised to learn about you?

I was a brewer for seven years in Winnipeg. I also worked at a distillery in Copenhagen for three months.

If you weren’t farming, what do you think you’d be doing?

Malting or brewing.

What is your favourite food or meal to cook?

I like cooking green curry. I also bake a lot, like kouign-amann. It’s kind of like a sweet and salty croissant.

The 4th International Wheat Congress: observations and opportunities

In May, MCA research program manager for cereal crops Lauren Gislason attended the 4th International Wheat Congress (IWC4) in Bologna, Italy, which reinforced the value of international collaboration in advancing wheat research.

While the scientific topics were diverse, common themes included climate resilience, disease management, sustainable production and application of new technologies. The conference also highlighted that many countries share Canada’s challenges, including reduced research investment, emerging production risks and the need to strengthen pathways that translate research into practical benefits for producers.

Observations and opportunities

  • IWC4 showcased the breadth of current global wheat research, with sessions focused on sustainable production systems, wheat breeding and genetics, genomics and genome editing, climate resilience, disease and pest management, digital agriculture and phenotyping, soil health, and reducing the environmental footprint of wheat production. Across these topics, there was a strong emphasis on multidisciplinary approaches and international collaboration to address emerging challenges facing the wheat sector.
  • International partners are facing many of the same challenges as Canada, including declining public investment in agricultural research, climate variability, evolving disease and pest pressures, and the need to attract and retain the next generation of agricultural scientists.
  • Collaborative funding models are becoming increasingly important to support large, complex wheat research initiatives. Discussions emphasized that successful international partnerships rely on trust, co-development of research priorities and regular communication among funders and researchers.
  • The “last mile” of research remains a universal challenge. While scientific collaboration is often strong, ensuring research outcomes are translated into practical tools and improved varieties that are adopted by farmers requires continued investment in extension and knowledge transfer.
  • Supporting Canadian researchers’ participation at international conferences provides significant value through networking, exposure to emerging research and technologies, information sharing, and the development of new international collaborations that can strengthen Canadian wheat research.
  • There may be opportunities to strengthen engagement among research funders, both internationally and within Canada, through dedicated funder workshops and renewed national forums, such as the Canadian Wheat Symposium, to encourage collaboration, reduce duplication and improve co-ordination of research investments.

Allan Feurtado, Team Lead, National Research Council Canada

Allan Feurtado is the Team Lead of Integrated Omics and Climate Resilience at the National Research Council Canada (NRC). Growing up in Ontario, he developed an interest in plants and crops that led him to study at Queen’s University, the University of Guelph and then Simon Fraser University. His research focused on seed dormancy and germination, which eventually brought him to the Prairies and his current role at the NRC.

Where did you work before the NRC?

I first came to the NRC in Saskatoon as a PhD student through Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, BC. What was originally meant to be a one-year visit, to work with specialists in plant hormone research, turned into the place where I completed my PhD. After my PhD, I stayed at the NRC in a postdoctoral research associate role, working on seed maturation and germination. Over time, I became interested in abiotic stress, because of the parallels with events in seed development and maturation. This eventually led to my current position as team lead and research officer with the NRC’s Aquatic and Crop Resource Development Research Centre.

What got you interested in your current area of work?

My interest in plant roots stemmed from our discovery that the root system plays a significant role in wheat lodging resistance in our Prairie environments. Root biology had always interested me and its connection to lodging issues faced by farmers renewed my interest to develop a project centred on root system architecture – the shape and spatial arrangement of root systems. The second priority was figuring out the best way to look at roots. That’s where my interest in photography and imaging came in. I started thinking about how we could best use imaging technology and analysis to gain better insight into the root system diversity of our crops, and that’s also when I teamed up with root researcher Leon Kochian at the University of Saskatchewan.

Tell us a bit about what you’re working on at the NRC.

One of the current projects I’m working on is “Root of the Problem 2.0: Solidifying barley lodging,” which is a continuation of earlier work where we looked at various stem and root traits to determine which were impacting lodging resistance. The work is being done in collaboration with barley breeder Aaron Beattie at the University of Saskatchewan. Through the first “Root of the Problem” project, we conducted field trials in a small set of barley cultivars with varying lodging tendencies to confirm and validate the major traits contributing to lodging resistance in barley. We found that, in addition to plant height, wider root angles help anchor the crop and improve lodging resistance.

Since it is quite labour intensive to study roots in the field, we also wanted to use our indoor root imaging techniques to see if we could develop an efficient method that could be used to initially screen for lodging resistance. We found that root angles measured shortly after germination using hydroponic pouches were also associated with lodging resistance in the field.

Those findings led to Root of the Problem 2.0, which began in summer 2024 as a four-year project. Our goal is to further validate our findings and build an AI / machine learning model that breeders could use to select for lodging resistance using indoor root imaging. We’re also evaluating a larger collection of barley, around 250 genotypes, to better understand the genetics of root traits and develop root-based markers that will be very useful for barley breeders. We are continuing to collaborate with Aaron Beattie on the work and have added Ana Badea at AAFC Brandon to collect additional lodging data that will be important for building our models.  

What can you say about the value of farmers providing funding and support to your organization?

It’s critical. At the NRC, part of our research is supported through external funding, so being able to work on projects that are directly relevant to industry and collaborate with breeders is incredibly important. Results coming out of our projects are applicable across the Prairies and involve funders from both crop organizations and government partners.

Support from farmers and the industry is essential for the research we want to do, especially bringing together the collaborations needed to elevate our research discoveries and outputs. Another important piece is science communication. It’s valuable that organizations like Manitoba Crop Alliance are interested in sharing our research with farmers and helping connect the science to the people who will ultimately benefit.

How does that farmer funding and support directly benefit farmers?

It has been important for me to build connections with crop development teams and breeders, and to work closely with them so the knowledge we are generating goes directly into breeding programs and helps develop the next generation of crops. Our goal is to give breeders tools to select barley with improved lodging resistance, which will ultimately help farmers reduce losses and improve crop productivity.

How do you spend your time outside of work?

My main hobby is photography, which relates back to my interest in image-based analysis of plants and our root imaging technologies. I’ve always enjoyed taking pictures, especially landscapes, nature, wildlife and places around Saskatchewan and Western Canada.

What is the best part about your job?

A couple of things come to mind. What really excites me is the science itself and the knowledge we can generate. Over the last decade, it has been exciting to see where that knowledge can go and the impact it can have through collaborations with plant breeders and other industry experts. The other part is working with collaborators and co-supervising students. I enjoy mentoring students, transferring knowledge and helping develop our next generation of potential scientists. It has been incredibly rewarding.

What is a good piece of advice you’ve received that has stuck with you?

Recently, I had a conversation with a new colleague about science being a team effort. We talked about surrounding yourself with people who bring diverse perspectives and expertise and about how critical this is to advancing research for Canada.

I’ve really seen the importance of that over the last five years through engaging with crop development teams, breeders, computer scientists, data engineers and AI/machine-learning experts. I see myself working at the intersection of crop biology and technology, where collaboration is essential.

It’s all part of surrounding yourself with an array of expertise and bringing different perspectives together to elevate what you are able to accomplish. That is advice I’ve received from several people over my career.

Top