More Control, Less Rush: Using Cash Advances to Strengthen Marketing Decisions

The following article is a recap of “Smart Financing for Manitoba Farmers,” a presentation in our Roots to Results Webinar Series. The full webinar recording can be viewed here.

Farming is one of the most capital-intensive businesses in Canada. Seed, fuel, fertilizer and land costs go out months before crop revenue comes in. And while yields and markets can fluctuate, input costs are constant and high.

That’s why cash flow strategy matters as much as production strategy. In the final presentation of our Roots to Results Webinar Series, Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) COO Darcelle Graham shared how an Advance Payments Program (APP) cash advance from MCA can serve as a practical, flexible tool to strengthen marketing power and reduce borrowing costs.

Turn Cash Flow Pressure into Marketing Power

The APP provides access to capital based on up to 50 per cent of your anticipated or stored production value. That means you don’t have to sell grain just to cover spring bills.

Implementation

Map out your 12- to 18-month cash flow needs. If input or rent payments are driving early sales, consider whether an advance could bridge the gap and let you market when prices improve.

Capture Interest Savings That Stay on Your Farm

The federal government covers the interest on the first $100,000 advanced (or up to $500,000 for canola only in 2026). That can translate into thousands of dollars in savings compared to traditional borrowing.

Implementation

Compare your operating loan rate to the APP rate (prime minus 0.5 per cent on interest-bearing portions). Run the math: what would $4,000–$20,000 in interest savings mean for your bottom line?

Match Repayment to Grain Sales

Unlike traditional loans, there are no fixed monthly payments. You repay as you sell your crop, within an 18-month window.

Implementation

Align your marketing plan with repayment timelines. As you price grain, set aside advance repayment within 30 days of receiving payment to stay compliant and avoid penalties.

Use It as a Tool for Transitional Periods

You don’t need to own land to qualify. You must own the crop, having grown and marketed it. That makes it especially helpful for young or transitioning farmers.

Implementation

If you’re farming rented land or gradually taking over the operation, explore whether separate advances (where eligible) could support working capital during transition years.

Treat the Application Like a Business Agreement

The program is flexible, but it requires accountability. Security, crop insurance (or inventory proof) and signed documentation are mandatory.

Implementation

Before applying, read the terms and conditions carefully. Confirm crop insurance coverage, review your creditor priority agreements and double-check signatures to avoid processing delays.

Korey Peters, sunflower crop committee

WEB_Korey-Peters

Korey Peters farms near Randolph, MB, with his family at Herbsigwil Farms. Herb is his grandpa, Sig is his uncle and Will is his dad. Korey is a third-generation farmer, and the fourth generation is already on the farm full-time. Herbsigwil Farms grows wheat, canola, soybeans, corn and sunflowers.

Korey lives on the farm with his wife and their two children, who enjoy spending lots of time in the yard.

What motivated you to get into farming?

I was always working on the farm in the summers. I came back full time in 2011 when my uncle had slowed down a little, and I just never left.

What motivated you to get involved with Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA)?

We started growing sunflowers when we were looking to add another crop in our rotation, and someone I know approached me because MCA was looking for committee members after some delegates had termed out.

We chatted about it. It’s not a huge time commitment to be on a crop committee. I had been on a few boards not related to ag, so I had an idea how they run. I thought I’d get involved, and that’s how it started.

It’s been great to meet other farmers. Most farmers love talking farming, especially with other farmers from Manitoba. There are differences depending on where you farm and the weather from east to west, so it’s interesting to talk about what varieties we’re growing, diseases and pests and how others are managing them, and the differences we can apply to our own farm.

What does your role on the sunflower crop committee involve?

We meet quarterly. MCA is a research-oriented organization, so we make decisions about whether we think research dollars should be used on certain proposals. We review proposals from graduate students and researchers related to sunflowers, whether that involves disease, genetics, insects or other issues. Projects can range from one- to five-year timelines. Before I joined, the committee had started the process of bringing a sunflower confection variety to Manitoba, which is now in trials here.

How has being a sunflower crop committee delegate benefitted you?

It’s helped me realize how much work goes on behind the scenes by boards and committees like this. Since MCA amalgamated, I feel like it has been very purposefully driven. MCA has really figured out its purpose and focused on it, and the subcommittees feel the effects of that. We come up with ideas and continue to do the work in the background, then pass it to the board of directors, which makes the final decisions on where things are heading.

Is there a project or area of work you’re especially proud of being part of as a delegate?

The confectionary sunflower variety. MCA has brought a confectionary seed variety almost to market. It’s very close. One of our board members is growing quite a bit of it this year. It was grown in 2025, and there’s a larger acreage planned for 2026. We have a few companies looking at purchasing it, and we’re starting the process of figuring out the best way to market it going forward.

Is there anything you’d like farmer members to know about the work MCA is doing?

MCA is really pushing to reach all its members through newsletters, social media, emails and outreach. They’re trying to let everybody know all this amazing research is happening. Farmers are always looking for answers. We like to talk to each other for real-life experience on the farm. This is research done by farmers, for farmers. Getting that information out there and working hard to spread the word is very important.

Why do you think other people should get involved with MCA?

I think being involved is great for farmers. It’s important to be involved in a committee of some kind, whether it’s research like MCA or something else, and to find a way to give back to the farming community. We all use the resources that come from it. A lot of people wonder where their check-off dollars go but don’t always look into it. When you get involved, you realize the value of those dollars going to organizations like MCA.

What are you most excited about when it comes to the future of your farm?

Since I’ve been farming full-time, our farm has gone through quite a growth spurt. The third generation has grown the farm and worked really hard at it. We’re now in a position to maintain and improve our land going forward. Rather than focusing on expansion, we’re looking at refining and improving what we have. We’re in a comfortable spot to support our families living here while improving efficiencies.

Do you have any hobbies outside of farming?

I enjoy golf in the summer and beer league hockey in the winter. I also help coach my kids’ hockey and baseball teams.

What’s your go-to field meal during busy seasons?

I’m obviously a child of the ’80s. I love a good pizza pop, even if it’s cold. Wrap it in tin foil, put it on the exhaust of the tractor and it warms right back up!

What’s one thing people might be surprised to learn about you?

I was a high school music teacher for five years before coming back to farming full-time. My family is musical. My sister is a music teacher, and my brother was involved in music growing up. That’s what happens when your dad’s a farmer and your mom’s a voice and music teacher: you get both worlds.

Follow Korey on X @koreypeters.

2025 Sunflower Crop Survey Results

The Sunflower Crop Survey is led by the National Sunflower Association and carried out by a network of volunteer from universities, government, producers and industry, including Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA). Participating regions include Manitoba, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Colorado, where data is collected on a number of variables and compiled to document sunflower growing conditions, pest challenges and yield. The survey is conducted on alternate years, with fall 2025 being the most recent.

Manitoba and U.S. Survey Overview:

191 Sunflower fields were samples across all participating regions. The following management practices were observed:

  • Sunflower type: 7% confection; 93% oilseed
  • Water Management: 2% irrigated; 98% dryland
  • Tillage: 24% conventional; 21% minimum; 55% no-till

The survey has a large focus on pest pressures. The cumulative pests that were monitored across all locations were as follows:

  • 34% of fields had blackbird damage
  • 11% of fields had seed maggot damage
  • 8% of fields had bud moth damage
  • 8% of fields had sunflower midge damage
  • 14% of fields had long-horned beetle damage. It is important to note that long-horned beetle has not been found in Manitoba during this survey, or in anecdotal scouting events, however there are fields sampled in this survey that are extremely close to the MB-ND border that had long-horned beetle (dectes) damage in both 2025 and 2023.

Manitoba Overview:

12 sunflower fields in 10 municipalities were sampled in Manitoba from the RM of Brokenhead to the RM of Two Borders:

  • Sunflower type: 100% oilseed
  • Water Management: 100% dryland
  • Tillage: 25% conventional; 67% minimum; 8% no-till
  • Row Spacing: 50% had 20” or narrower row spacing, 50% had 22” to 30” row spacing

Each field was surveyed in two locations and a small sample area of two rows by 25 feet was used to gather data in each of the two locations. Pests were recorded, full plants were assessed, and seed samples were taken.

The highest yield in a sampled area was 2,792 lb/ac.

The lowest yield in a sampled area was 983 lb/ac.

The average yield among all 12 fields sampled was 2,000 lb/ac.

Yield-Limiting Factors

  • Seven of the 12 fields were limited mainly by disease, in general.
  • One of the 12 fields was limited mainly by bird presence and feeding.
  • One of the 12 fields was limited mainly by row spacing, as it was a solid-seeded field. This was hard to measure yield on such a small scale with fewer plants per foot of row.
  • Three of the 12 fields were limited mainly by weed pressure, with one of them being specifically limited by kochia infestation. In the 12 fields, weed pressure was generally quite low and not at all a concern in 75% of the fields.
  • Secondary limitations in the 12 fields sampled included wildlife (i.e., elk), lodging, insect, sclerotinia and birds.

Disease Presence and Severity

Sclerotinia:

  • Sclerotinia basal stem rot was minor in all fields sampled. Half of the fields had no basal wilt present. One field had up to eight plants with basal wilt symptoms, which would be estimated at about 8% of the sample size in that field.
  • Sclerotinia mid-stalk rot presence was similar to basal stem rot. Eight fields had zero or just one plant infected; one field had six infections and another had seven infections; two fields had 10 or 12 plants infected, respectively.
  • Sclerotinia head rot were higher, in general. Half of the fields had four or less infected heads; three fields had 5-7 infected heads, one field had 10 infected heads, one field had 12 infected heads and one field had 22 infected heads. This last field did report the lowest yield as well, unsurprisingly.

Downy Mildew:

  • Low incidence among all fields, except one that had four affected plants

Phomopsis:

  • Six of the 12 fields had almost negligible one or zero plants with Phomopsis infections.
  • Five of the 12 fields had from six to 15 stalks infected with Phomopsis.
  • One field had 40 plants with Phomopsis infections, which was roughly 80% incidence in that location.

Phoma:

  • Incidence was much higher and present in relatively high numbers in each of the 12 fields, except for two that had zero incidence.
  • The three highest fields of incidence had 32, 42 and 46 plants with Phoma stem infections.

Rhizopus:

Rhizopus has not been a disease of concern in Manitoba, simply because it can largely go undetected. The last time the sunflower survey was conducted, in 2023, three of eight fields had Rhizopus in the sample set.

Rhizopus can be identified on a sunflower head by the presence of gray, fuzzy mycelium, usually viewed on the face and between developed seeds. The disease prefers warm, humid environments and most often originates via wounds on the back of the sunflower head. Infections do affect yield by limiting seed fill and potentially causing head drop in severe cases.

Rhizopus on sunflower head. Photo courtesy of North Dakota State University.

Sunflower Rust:

Sunflower rust was very minimal in 2025 and was found in four of the 12 fields at very minor severity in September. The highest severity was one field that exhibited 0.75% of leaf area on the top four leaves being affected by rust pustules.

Verticillium Wilt:

Verticillium wilt is also uncommon in sunflower fields in Manitoba, though it was found in the 2025 survey. Symptoms can include leaf mottle, or interveinal chlorosis, and a greenish discolouration on the stem, where further inspection is required. By splitting the stem at the base of the plant, discoloured vascular tissue is visible around the pith.

  • Three fields were found to have Verticillium wilt with five, six and 12 plants infected, respectively.

Insect Presence and Severity

Sunflower Midge:

  • Seven of the 12 fields had Sunflower Midge damage.
  • The field with the greatest damage had seven affected heads.

Sunflower Seed Maggot:

  • Three of 12 fields had Sunflower Seed Maggot damage.
  • Each of the three fields had one plant affected.

Sunflower Bud Moth:

  • Nine of 12 fields had Sunflower Bud Moth damage, specifically on the sunflower head.
  • The field with the greatest damage had 14 affected heads, followed by a field that had 10 affected heads.
  • The remaining seven fields had minor damage noted.

Blackbird Presence and Severity

Blackbird feeding was noted in five of the 12 fields sampled. Assessment is based on the area of the sunflower head with missing seed that has recognizably been fed on by birds. Seed is usually completely missing and sunflower seed shells may be found on or near the plant in question.

All four fields with damage noted were quite minor in the sampled areas, the greatest having about 6.35% of the total head area missing seed.

Other Yield Factors

Actual plant populations of sampled fields ranged from 12,200 to 24,400 plants per acre. Strangely enough, the lowest populated field also had the smallest head size, averaging about 5.75” in diameter. The field with largest head size overall was 8.45” diameter. Generally, head size was smaller in the sampled fields than an average year would see, but this may have been a result of dry growing conditions during head development.

Seed size was reported to be good to excellent and seed fill ranged from 70 – 99% across the 12 fields. Centre seed set was reasonable, but there were some fields that did have up to two inches of the head centre undeveloped, which drastically affects yield.

MCA would like to thank all 12 participants of the Sunflower Survey for allowing us to use your fields for this project. Also, thank you to Manitoba Agriculture oilseeds specialist Sonia Wilson and crop production extension specialist Callum Morrison for your help surveying several fields. Finally, thank you to Dr. Ahmed Abdelmagid, research scientist and oilseed pathologist at AAFC Morden, for surveying several fields and collecting various samples of sunflower diseases to understand the scope of disease presence in Manitoba.

Cheers to five years: Anniversary food and drink collaborations help MCA give back

When we started thinking about how we wanted to celebrate Manitoba Crop Alliance’s fifth anniversary, we knew we wanted to give back to our farmer members, industry partners and the broader agriculture community, who have all helped the organization become what it is today. After much consideration, we decided the best way to do that was with some special food and drink made from MCA crops grown right here in Manitoba.

The result was three unique and delicious anniversary collaborations:

Beer

Our anniversary beer was brewed in collaboration with Trans Canada Brewing Co., a mainstay in the Winnipeg craft brewing community. For the anniversary brew, we couldn’t have asked for a better partner than Trans Canada, which shares our belief in the importance of supporting local farmers, buying (and drinking) local and giving back to the community. The beer was produced using malt from Scythe Malting Co. in Springstein, MB, which is owned and operated by MCA director Jeffrey Stobbe-Wiebe and his family.

Our “Stronger Together” light lager was distributed to MCA delegates during the 2026 all delegates meeting in Brandon, handed out to attendees following the 2026 MCA AGM and also made available to all CropConnect attendees during the Farmer Saloon portion of the conference.

Bread

Our anniversary white pan bread was created by our friends and longtime collaborators at Cereals Canada. Given our strong, existing ties with Cereals Canada through our membership in the organization, and the important market development and access work they do on behalf of our farmer members, it was a natural partnership. The bread was distributed to all farmer members who attended the 2026 MCA AGM.

Coming Soon: Whisky

Our final collaboration is a special anniversary whisky produced with Winnipeg’s Patent 5 Distillery. The base spirit was made from a mixture of locally grown corn, wheat and barley for a unique, Made-in-Manitoba flavour. The anniversary whisky is currently aging in barrels, where it will remain for the next several years, with plans to bottle and release the final product in 2030 when we celebrate MCA’s 10th anniversary. We are sure it will be worth the wait!

Gallery: Behind the scenes at Trans Canada Brewing Co.

Meet Manitoba Crop Alliance’s 2025-26 post-secondary bursary recipients

MCA_2025-26 PS Bursary Recipients Graphic_X

Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) is proud to support agriculture’s next generation. MCA’s bursary program is designed to assist with the financial needs of students pursuing education in a field that will benefit the agriculture sector.

Six post-secondary students from Manitoba have been awarded with MCA 2025-26 bursaries valued at $2,000 each. The 2025-26 bursary recipients are Daniela Heinrichs from Clearwater, Marco Fanzago from Elm Creek, Evan Whetter from Alexander, Kayden Stewart from Rosser, Cohen Crammond from Austin, and Nolan Marginet from Treherne.

“Today’s students are agriculture’s future leaders, and we are proud to support the next generation as they continue their education,” says MCA chair Jonothan Hodson. “This year’s post-secondary bursary recipients all have deep roots in agriculture and a desire to broaden their knowledge. I look forward to seeing how they will advance our industry and give back to their communities.”

Bursary applicants needed to meet the following criteria:

  • Have completed a minimum of one year (two terms) of post-secondary education at the college or university level (diploma or degree) and are enrolled full-time for the 2025-26 school year in an agricultural program within Canada.
  • Have achieved a minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) of 3.0.
  • Have an interest in wheat (spring or winter), corn, barley, flax or sunflower crops, or agriculture in general, as demonstrated in a brief, one-page letter.
  • Are from a farm that is a member in good standing with MCA.
  • Have not previously been awarded an MCA post-secondary bursary (past high school bursary recipients remain eligible for a post-secondary bursary).

An independent selection committee was contracted to evaluate the applicants based on their connection to or interest in agriculture, explanation of why they decided to enrol in an agriculture-related post-secondary program, how they hope to benefit the agriculture industry once they have graduated and are in the workforce, and their academics and writing skills.

This year, the selection committee included Melody Caron, the owner/director of independent crop production research company TapRoot Research Ltd., and Elizabeth Karpinchick, a registered professional agrologist working as an independent consultant for Tone Ag Consulting Ltd.

Caron started TapRoot Research Ltd. in 2022 and has been supporting varietal development, pesticide efficacy and fertility research in the Red River Valley and Carman, MB. Her background in soil science, agroecology and as a field biologist have all contributed to her interest and expertise in conducting field research in Manitoba. Caron and her husband have two children and operate a grain farm near Brunkild, MB, where they grow cereals, soybeans and canola.

Karpinchick specializes in field crop agronomy, soil testing, on-farm testing and organic crop production. She serves on the Agrologist Manitoba board of directors and is president of the St. Pierre Agricultural Society, the St. Pierre CDC and the Frog Follies Committee.

Thank you to the selection committee for evaluating the bursary applications and congratulations to the 2025-26 bursary recipients!

Meet the MCA 2025-26 bursary recipients

Rethinking Crop Insurance for your Farm

The following article is a recap of “Beyond Basic Coverage: Unlocking the Value of Crop Coverage Plus,” a presentation in our Roots to Results Webinar Series. The full webinar recording can be viewed here.

Risk management is, in part, about making sure one poor crop year doesn’t severely impact the overall trajectory of your farm.

During a recent webinar, Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation’s (MASC) David Van Deynze and Scott Clayton asked farmers to think differently about crop insurance: not as protection for individual crops, but as protection for the farm as a whole.

Crop Coverage Plus shifts the focus from isolated losses to overall farm performance, offering higher coverage levels and, in some cases, meaningful premium savings for diversified operations. By recognizing how different crops succeed and struggle under the same conditions, whole-farm coverage aims to provide protection that matches the way Manitoba farms actually operate.

Shift from Crop-by-Crop to Whole-Farm Thinking

Crop Coverage Plus evaluates the combined value of all insured crops, allowing strong yields to offset weaker ones.

Implementation

Review your insurance decisions across your entire crop mix instead of one line item at a time.

Crop Diversity Can Unlock Better Protection

Farms with multiple crops may qualify for coverage levels up to 90 per cent, sometimes at a lower premium than standard 80 per cent coverage.

Implementation

If you’re growing three or more crops, ask your MASC insurance specialist to model your farm under Crop Coverage Plus.

Not All Crops Move Together — and That Matters

Some crops respond differently to heat, moisture or timing. Those differences reduce overall risk when measured at the farm level.

Implementation

Consider how crops like winter wheat or corn behave differently across seasons when planning rotations.

Fewer Claims, but Stronger Support When It Counts

While small, single-crop claims may be offset, farms tend to receive larger indemnities in years when most crops suffer.

Implementation

Decide whether your operation benefits more from frequent small payouts or stronger protection in difficult years.

Reseed Benefits Increase with Higher Coverage

Reseed payments are calculated as a percentage of coverage. Higher coverage means larger reseed support when conditions force a restart.

Implementation

Factor early-season weather risk into your insurance choice, especially in moisture-prone areas.

MCA-funded research at the 2025 Manitoba Agronomists’ Conference

On Dec. 10 and 11, 2025, Manitoba agronomists met to discuss the latest developments in pest, crop and soil management. This year, the conference theme was “From Gaps to Gains: Unlocking Crop Potential.” Much of the research shared at the Manitoba Agronomists’ Conference was funded in part by Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA). Below is a summary of the posters shared that feature MCA-funded research!

Crop Management

Growing Together: Learnings from Manitoba Spring Wheat YEN Pilot

Andrew Hector, Madison Kostal, Manitoba Crop Alliance; Anne Kirk, Mark Lysack, Manitoba Agriculture

Digging Deeper: Identifying Long-Coleoptile Wheat for Dry Seeding Success

M.K. Carkner, C.A. McCartney, M.H. Entz, University of Manitoba; S. Kumar, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Effect of Preceding Crop and Residue Management on Corn Establishment in Manitoba

Ramona Mohr, Gordon Finlay, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Diffusion-based Dataset Augmentation for Downstream Crop Segmentation

Alex Senden, Masoomeh Gomroki, Robert Gulden, Christopher Henry, University of Manitoba

SOIL MANAGEMENT

Investigating the Effects of Soil Moisture and Temperature on the Transformation of N Fertilizer in Soil

Carlie Johnston, Xiaopeng Gao, Ramona Mohr, Timi Ojo, University of Manitoba; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

The Influence of Nitrogen Stabilizers and Split Fertilizer Application on Agronomic Performance and Mitigation of N2O Emission from Canadian Western Red Spring (CWRS) Wheat

L.H.N. Sawbhagya, B. Sparling, M. Tenuta, University of Manitoba; M. St. Luce, B. May, H. Kubota, B. Beres, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

Pest Management

CWRepViT-Net: An Encoder-Decoder Deep Learning Framework with RepViT Blocks for Crop Weed Semantic Segmentation in Soybean Fields through their Life Journey

Masoomeh Gomroki, Dilshan Benaragma, Christopher Henry, Nasem Badreldin, Rob Gulden, University of Manitoba

Bacterial Leaf Streak Transmission Driven by Seed Infection and Irrigation

Vinuri Weerasinghe, Malini Jayawardana, Shaheen Bibi, W.G. Dilantha Fernando, University of Manitoba

For a full list of poster presentations and speakers from the 2025 conference, visit the Manitoba Agronomists’ Conference website

Thank you to the conference partners, the University of Manitoba Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Manitoba Agriculture, for hosting an excellent conference!

2025 Manitoba Corn Disease Survey Results

Anne Kirk, Manitoba Agriculture
Morgan Cott, Manitoba Crop Alliance
Simon Huang, Manitoba Agriculture

A corn disease survey was conducted across Manitoba in September of 2025.  Crop disease surveys are important for documenting the severity and geographical distribution of various diseases. Results from disease surveys provide warning about new diseases and help to prioritize where future research is needed. 

Methods

A total of 54 fields were surveyed across Manitoba to document the prevalence (% of fields having infection) and incidence (average % of plants showing infection within infected fields) of various corn diseases. Field were surveyed in September around the beginning of crop maturity.  

Plants were visually assessed for the presence of Goss’s wilt (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis), common rust (Puccinia sorghi), common smut (Ustilago maydis), head smut (Sphacelotheca reiliana), and stalk rot.  Holcus spot (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) was recorded in some but not all fields.  In each field, 50 plants were surveyed in a “W” pattern, where the five points of the “W” were at least 50 paces apart and 100 m from field edges.  The presence or absence of disease was noted for each of the 50 sampled plants per field, except for Goss’s wilt and holcus spot.  Goss’s wilt and holcus spot were simply recorded as present or absent for each field.

Results
At crop maturity Goss’s wilt was found in 54% of the fields sampled, making it the most common disease found in the fall survey.  Holcus spot was found in the majority of fields surveyed in the central region, but prevalence is not reported as all surveyors were not assessing plants for holcus spot. Head smut, common rust, stalk rot, and common smut were found in 33%, 11%, 7% and 6% of fields surveyed, respectively (Table 1). 

 Table 1. Results of the 2025 corn disease survey.  Prevalence (% of fields having infection) and incidence (average % of plant showing infection within infected fields) for each region and for all fields surveyed.

Region

Common Rust

Common Smut

Head Smut

Stalk Rot

Anthracnose Stalk Rot

Goss’s Wilt

Central (35 fields)

      

    % Prevalence

14

9

29

6

0

71

    % Incidence

17

8

3

13

0

n/a

Eastern (9 fields)

      

    % Prevalence

0

0

22

11

0

44

    % Incidence

0

0

8

2

0

n/a

Interlake (2 fields)

      

    % Prevalence

50

0

0

50

0

0

    % Incidence

10

0

0

6

0

n/a

Southwest (8 fields)

      

    % Prevalence

0

0

75

0

0

0

    % Incidence

0

0

5

0

0

n/a

Manitoba (54 fields)

      

    % Prevalence

11

6

33

7

0

54

    % Incidence

16

8

4

9

0

n/a

Acknowledgements
This survey was supported by Manitoba Agriculture and Manitoba Crop Alliance.  Thank you to the grower co-operators who allowed for their fields to be surveyed and provided surveyors with field information. 

Contributed by Anne Kirk, Cereal Crop Specialist with Manitoba Agriculture.

Christopher Bidinosti, professor, University of Winnipeg

Photo courtesy the University of Winnipeg.
Photo courtesy the University of Winnipeg.

Physics professor Christopher Bidinosti has been at the University of Winnipeg since 2007, and much of his recent work sits at the intersection of computing and agriculture. As a co-founder of the TerraByte research group, Bidinosti is helping advance digital agriculture in Manitoba by supporting plant science research with new data and imaging tools.

Where did you work before?

I’ve been in universities most of my life. Before coming to the University of Winnipeg, I was a postdoctoral researcher at Simon Fraser University and prior to that at the École Normale Supérieure in Paris, France. Before that, I was a graduate student at the University of British Columbia and an undergraduate student at Brandon University. I also worked at Ayerst Organics in Brandon, MB, where they extracted estrogen from the pregnant mare’s urine and made hormone replacement drugs.

What got you interested in this area of work?

I’ve always had an interest in plants, gardens and growing food. Even though I don’t do it, I still find it fascinating. So, when my colleague and I were working on advanced computing techniques about 10 years ago, I saw this as an opportunity to engage my interest in agriculture. With the shrinking cost and size of sensors, like cameras in our phones, and the massive increase in computing power, it felt like the right time to jump into this kind of research.

Tell us a bit about what you’re working on at the University.

Our research group, TerraByte, works on several aspects of digital agriculture, including data generation, data hosting and sharing, and machine learning models for things like plant classification and disease detection. We primarily work with plant scientists, helping them automate and expedite visual tasks like phenotyping and disease assessment. We like to think of what we do as research helping research.

Michael Beck, Christopher Henry and I have been pushing digital agriculture for a long time. When Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) put out its “hope and dreams” call last fall, we knew we had to pitch the idea for the Manitoba Centre for Digital Ag (MCDA). When you look at other jurisdictions, there is significant investment in digital agriculture, and we felt strongly that Manitoba needed a more co-ordinated approach. The MCDA isn’t about a single building or institution. It’s about bringing researchers, grower organizations, government, and industry together around a shared provincial strategy. Our focus is on mobilizing researchers across universities and colleges to work collaboratively, apply for funding together and make better use of the digital tools we already have. That’s the vision we’re working toward, and we really appreciate MCA’s support in helping move it forward.

What can you say about the value of farmers providing funding and support to your organization?

It’s huge and we appreciate it very much. It’s very forward thinking. There is no doubt that computers will bring as much change to agriculture as engineering, chemistry or genetics have in the past.

How does that farmer funding and support directly benefit farmers?

It really goes back to work we do with plant scientists and researchers. If we can help them expedite their breeding programs, then heartier crop varieties that are more pest, disease or heat resistance, for example, can make it to farms much sooner. That’s where we see a real, long-term benefit for farmers.

One example of this is work we do in the lab using low-cost cameras to take images of plants from many different angles and build 3D computer models of them. From those models, we can automatically extract plant traits like height, width, volume and leaf angle, without disrupting the plant’s growth cycle or relying on visual scoring. A lot of plant science still depends on people visually ranking plants, which takes a huge amount of time and can be quite subjective. What we’re doing replaces hours or days of manual work with something that takes minutes and produces consistent results.

For plant breeders, that’s a big deal. It means they can evaluate more plants, more accurately and much faster than before. That speeds up research and helps identify promising varieties earlier in the process. While this work isn’t showing up directly on farms next year, it influences the varieties that farmers will eventually be growing.

We’re very thankful for the trust farmers have placed in us. We’re always happy to talk about what we’re working on and to hear about other projects we could be involved in. This kind of work is an investment in the future, and we take that responsibility seriously.

How do you spend your time outside of work?

Biking, running and reading.

What is the best part about your job?

The best part of my job is working in an area that I find genuinely fascinating and working with inspired students. Over the last several years, my focus has shifted more toward digital agriculture, which brings together engineering, imaging equipment and computation. We often talk about how engineering plus agriculture gave us tractors, chemistry plus agriculture gave us pesticides, genetics plus agriculture gave us breeding, and now it’s computers plus agriculture. No one knows exactly where it will land, but there’s no doubt it’s going to be big, and that’s what makes it so interesting to work on.

What gets you most excited about your work?

The people I work with. I have amazing colleagues and collaborators who are incredibly talented and fun to work with, and I’ve worked closely with some of them for many years. The work itself is also fascinating because of how complicated it is. Plants and real farm fields are insanely complicated systems, even more so than physics, and that challenge is what keeps the work exciting.

Learn more at terrabyte.acs.uwinnipeg.ca

Practical Farm Finance Lessons for Uncertain Times

The following article is a recap of “Staying Ahead of the Curve, “ a presentation in our Roots to Results Webinar Series. The full webinar recording can be viewed here.

Farming has always involved risk, but today the risks feel sharper. Volatile markets, rising input costs, unpredictable weather and tighter margins are forcing many farms to think differently about how they make decisions.

In our latest Roots to Results webinar, Evan Shout, president and co-founder of Maverick Ag, challenged the idea that these pressures are completely out of our hands. While farmers can’t control markets or weather, they can control how they prepare their business to respond. This preparation starts with understanding the right numbers, not all the numbers.

Strong land equity has helped many farms stay stable, but equity alone doesn’t create flexibility. Cash flow, debt structure, cost awareness and timing increasingly determine whether a farm can hold grain, invest wisely or weather a tough year without being forced into making hard decisions.

Know the Three Numbers That Really Matter

Not every ratio deserves your attention, but three do: working capital, debt service ratio and debt-to-equity. These are the numbers lenders watch and they shape your day-to-day flexibility. Strong working capital gives you selling power, a healthy debt service ratio keeps the bank on your side and debt-to-equity tells you how much cushion you really have.

Implementation

Ask your accountant for accrual financial statements and calculate these ratios annually. Track trends, not just single-year results.

Calculate Your True Cost of Production

Cost of production isn’t just seed and fertilizer. It also includes machinery depreciation, family living draws and even the opportunity cost of owning land. When those costs are hidden, pricing decisions become emotional instead of strategic.

Implementation

Use conservative, 10-year average yields and today’s prices. Include personal drawings and realistic equipment depreciation to find your real break-even.

Use Break-Even Numbers to Guide Marketing

Once you know your break-even, marketing becomes clearer. Instead of hoping for a rally, you can decide when selling at a small loss protects the whole farm, or when a crop is carrying the operation.

Implementation

Pair break-even prices with a simple return-on-investment target. Share these numbers with whoever handles marketing, so decisions support the entire business.

Treat Lean Management as Risk Management

In tighter years, controlling costs matters more than chasing yield. Lean management isn’t about cutting blindly; it’s about finding small efficiencies that reduce pressure on cash flow and debt.

Implementation

Review expenses line by line. Ask what can be delayed, downsized or done differently this year without hurting long-term productivity.

Benchmark, But Know the Story Behind the Numbers

Comparing your farm to others can reveal blind spots, especially in machinery, labour and debt per acre. However, numbers only make sense with context.

Implementation

Benchmark against similar farms and against your own five-year history. Use percentages of revenue, not just dollars per acre, to spot trends.

Top