Making Every Pound Count: Nutrient Management in Corn

Fertility starts with the soil and the variables that make nutrients available to a growing crop.

Know Your Soil Texture

  • Clay – very fine, soils with >50% clay
  • Silt – rock & mineral particles that are larger than clay and smaller than sand. Soils with >87% silt
  • Sand – very coarse, soils with >70% sand
  • Loam – a balanced mixture of clay, silt and sand (approximately 20-40-40)

 

Soil Texture Triangle
Soil Texture Triangle

Soil texture determines a soil’s water holding capacity. Sand has low capacity to hold water and low water content at permanent wilting point (~10-15% v/v). Clay loam has a higher capacity to hold water, therefore has a higher water content at permanent wilting point (~15-20% v/v).

Relationship Between Soil Texture and Water Availability
Relationship Between Soil Texture and Water Availability

Nutrient Balance

Nutrient balance is vital to soil fertility and crop production. Nitrogen is most commonly the first and most limiting nutrient for non-legume crops, but without an adequate fertility blend with other nutrients, nitrogen use efficiency is not “maxed out” and suffers.

A poorly fertilized corn crop uses just a little less soil water over the season than an adequately fertilized crop, and yet fewer bushels of corn are produced per inch of water used. The properly fertilized crop is able to be much more efficient in water usage to produce more grain per inch of water used.

Nutrient Uptake

 Nutrient movement in the soil and uptake by plant roots is important to understand because it dictates where fertilizer placement best facilitates root uptake. Nitrogen and sulfur are very mobile in the soil and move via mass flow. This essentially means that they move with the soil water. As a plant transpires water, the roots are required to draw in more nutrient-rich soil water and they do this by creating tension that draws the soil water to the roots. The rate of transpiration is related to environmental conditions, so poor soil moisture or cold temperatures,  for example, will decrease the rate of transpiration, therefore decrease uptake of soil water (and nutrients) via mass flow. Phosphorus and potassium move in the soil via diffusion, meaning that with the help of soil moisture, the nutrients move from areas of high P or K concentration to areas of lower P or K concentration. As the nutrients are absorbed by plant roots and moved up into the plant, the roots become an area of low concentration, thereby drawing nutrients towards the roots from a higher concentration zone.

Nutrient Mass Flow & Diffusion
Nutrient Mass Flow & Diffusion

Nitrogen

 Exact nitrogen rates in corn are still hard to identify and perfect. Modern corn hybrids have improved in nitrogen use efficiency, but more than that is required to optimize nitrogen uptake. We have already discussed how nutrient balance in the soil optimizes nutrient uptake, but soil conditions and the environment above and below the ground play major roles in this as well.

In 2016-17, John Heard, former Manitoba Agriculture Soil Fertility Specialist, performed a nitrogen use and uptake project in corn to identify whether nitrogen recommendations needed to be updated. Following this project, Dr. Don Flaten’s graduate student, Lanny Gardiner, then began his Master’s research, in 2018, on a similar study, “Optimum Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Strategies for Modern Corn Hybrids in Manitoba”. The two studies complemented each other with similar findings, which were the following:

Nitrogen requirement to achieve the economically optimum yield for higher and lower potential yields. John Heard, 2022 – Profitable Nitrogen Rates.

 

A site that has a “lower” potential yield would be one that could be considered to have poor productivity. This may include variables like drainage issues, salinity, soil productivity, or poor crop management choices like delayed seeding, compaction issues, or delayed weed control, for example.

Dry sites in 2018-19 needed more nitrogen to achieve similar yields because dry soils have less mineralization of soil organic matter and decreased mass flow movement of nitrate-N to the plant root.

Phosphorus

Phosphorus is required for plant growth and seed development, therefore should be placed at least in a sideband for availability in early growth. It is not very mobile in the soil and will not get leached in spring conditions like we know nitrogen will in high moisture.

The general recommendation for phosphorus requirements in corn is +0.6 lbs of P per bushel of yield. Uptake is equivalent to 0.6 lbs P/bu and removal is 0.36 lbs P/bu, so it is very important to consider what your preferred level of phosphorus in the soil is following a corn crop.

Applying phosphorus at planting is the best practice for availability. The safest placement is in a 2×2 band but proceed with caution if applying P in a sideband with other nutrients. P is used throughout the season and some farmers choose to apply additional P in-crop, which can be a good practice but not studied thoroughly in Manitoba to come to an economical conclusion.

Potassium

Corn requires 1.28 lbs K per bushel, but will only remove 0.21 lbs K/bu. In a 150 bushel crop, uptake will be about 192 lbs of potassium and removal will be 32 lbs of potassium because so much of the nutrient stays in the vegetative tissues. Manitoba soils are generally high in potassium, but it is important to monitor and fertilize to maintain K supply in the soil. 

To support a corn crop, ensure there is greater than 200 ppm of K in the soil. When levels start appearing in the 100’s, farmers may see benefits from adding K at this time. Livestock farmers may find a significant benefit from applying manure in this situation.

If potassium becomes deficient, the plant will pull the nutrient from older leaves to feed the younger leaves, developing grain, etc., just like nitrogen, and that is when deficiency symptoms appear.

Sulfur

Sulfur is not needed in high quantities like our other three macros, but it is required for corn development and chlorophyll production, therefore photosynthesis. 

Corn does not necessarily respond to additional sulfur fertilizer, unless soils are already deficient, whereby a yield response will occur with fertilization. Farmers should be aware of sulfur levels in the soil and be prepared to apply sulfur when levels decline. Sulphate sources are typically available to the crop immediately, so timing of application can be flexible. If deficiency symptoms appear (interveinal striping), rescue applications can be effectively made. 

Additional Resources on Corn Fertilization:

Introducing Year Three of MCA’s Strategic Plan

The third and final year of MCA’s 2024-27 strategic plan has begun! New Step Goals have been developed and strategy execution is ongoing. MCA directors and staff worked collaboratively to make the updated strategic plan. Below is the breakdown of year three.

Big Goal Tweaks

There was one tweak to the wording of Big Goal #3. The wording change aligns better with the intent of the Big Goal and leaves space for the Big Goal to be robust and meet organizational needs. 

  • Big Goal #3: Inspire areas for bold investment that facilitate historic initiatives.

New Step Goals

  • Nine new Step Goals were developed spanning all Big Goals. Many of the new Step Goals build on the outcomes from year two of the plan.
  • All the Step Goals were developed to complete the Big Goals and ensure MCA continues its positive impact as an organization.

Below is MCA’s strategic plan for 2026-27. Stay tuned for more information regarding MCA’s strategic plan on our website and in our publications!

 

MCA Strategic Plan – Year Two Wrap Up

Another successful year for strategy execution is in the books for Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA)! In 2025-26, MCA completed year two of its 2024-2027 strategic plan, building on the successes of year one and setting a strong foundation for year three. MCA staff have been working hard over the last year to achieve the organizational vision laid out by MCA’s directors and delegates.

First, let’s take a step back and review the structure of MCA’s strategic plan. The three-year strategic plan was developed to deliberately steer MCA’s future and make sure Manitoba farming becomes more productive and sustainable. The strategic plan consists of three Big Goals, which will be achieved over the three-year period. Each Big Goal has three corresponding Step Goals. Step Goals are developed annually, and when executed, move us closer to completing Big Goals and fulfilling the vision of MCA. Below is a recap of the 2025-26 strategic plan, including successes, challenges and learnings.

General Wins

To ensure that MCA’s strategic plan moved off the shelf, MCA has evolved its strategy execution process to meet organizational needs. The adapted execution process deliberately creates space for strategy execution in staff members’ schedules, allowing progress on Step Goals to be made. The process was tailored to MCA staff needs, resulting in greater resource use efficiency and allocation of staff time.

Furthermore, MCA’s annual Step Goals were developed with the organization’s scope of work, capacity and expertise in mind. This made the 2025-26 Step Goals impactful and created a clear pathway forward for completion.

Step-Goal-Specific Wins

Big Goal #1: Innovate our communications program to increase awareness and engagement with our farmer members.

Step Goal #1: Identify opportunities for innovation within our communications program that will drive engagement and awareness among our farmer members.

  • Strong MCA staff and farmer participation resulted in important learnings about the impact of our current communication initiatives and future engagement opportunities with our farmer members. Through one-on-one interviews between MCA staff and farmer members, a clear understanding of communication needs and persisting gaps was established. Farmer members’ stories drove the learnings for Step Goal #1 and provided invaluable insights that will be carried forward across Big Goal #1.
  • Win: Connecting with farmer members to build two communication initiatives that build trust and engagement in MCA, while addressing communication gaps outlined by members. Stay tuned for the new initiatives!

Step Goal #2: Prioritize and implement communications innovations.

  • Step Goal #2 was not completed in 2025-26. Step Goal #2 depended on completion of Step Goal #1, which required more time and resources than anticipated.

Step Goal #3: Develop a framework for assessing the success of communication innovations.

  • Step Goal #3 was not completed in 2025-26. Step Goal #3 depended on completion of Step Goal #1, which required more time and resources than anticipated

Big Goal #2: Strengthen research capacity for the benefit of Manitoba farmers

Step Goal #4: Secure new research partnerships with Manitoba post-secondary institutions.

  • Securing new research partnerships is essential to ensure impactful research is conducted on behalf of Manitoba farmers. Multiple roadblocks arose when engaging in new research partnerships, leading this Step Goal to be suspended.
  • Win: Step Goal learnings and resources were applied to other strategic activities, enabling the successful execution of other Step Goals.

Step Goal #5: Actively engage in strategic plant breeding programs in Manitoba.

  • Due to changes in partners’ capacity and Step Goal requirements moving outside the scope of MCA’s circle of control, this Step Goal was suspended.
  • Win: Early recognition of Step Goal roadblocks led to MCA resources being allocated to fulfill other aspects of the strategic plan.

Step Goal #6: Assess current fulfillment of MCA research priorities to identify and address gaps.

  • MCA conducted a fulsome audit of our current fulfillment of research priorities for all crop types and the whole farm program. The assessment reviewed all research projects funded by MCA since 2016 and categorized the research priorities they fit. This assessment highlighted current gaps in priority fulfillment and areas where significant research has occurred.
  • Win: Findings were shared with MCA crop committees and the board of directors, providing insights into overall and crop-specific priority fulfillment trends. These findings will help guide future project funding efforts to enhance MCA’s impact and responsiveness to evolving producer needs.

Big Goal #3: Explore areas for bold investment that facilitates historic progress.

Step Goal #7: Develop and execute a targeted advocacy plan focused on research investment.

  • MCA succeeded in the development of a targeted advocacy plan to ensure Manitoba farmers’ research and innovation needs are met.
  • Win: Advocacy plan was implemented and execution has already begun!

Step Goal #8: Identify areas of investment that advance the management skills and knowledge of our farmer members.

  • To fulfill Step Goal #8, MCA created the Roots to Results Webinar Series, which provided a deeper understanding of farm business management skills that are valued by our farmer members. The series accomplished this by hosting webinars featuring recognized industry experts who discussed management skills that can have a real impact on the farm.
  • Win: The series successfully provided in-depth knowledge of topics such as grain marketing, farm finances, crop insurance and tax strategies. Wrap-up articles can be found here and webinars are available on the MCA YouTube channel.

Step Goal #9: Identify opportunities for leadership training investment in our farmer members.

  • To fulfill Step Goal #9, MCA hosted the LeaderShift Insight program for farmer members. This in-person program took place in mid-December and covered multiple topics, including the “human” side of agriculture, performing better under pressure, farm transitioning, business planning and improved self and social awareness.
  • Win: Participants built leadership skills that they took back to their farms and communities.

Sam Markell, professor, North Dakota State University

WEB_Markell_HeadShoulder_SGM_4014

Sam Markell is a professor and extension plant pathologist at North Dakota State University (NDSU). He was born in rural Minnesota and lived on a small farm until he was 10 before moving to Minneapolis. After graduating high school, he came to NDSU to play football and study engineering. He played football for four years but changed majors multiple times before falling in love with science. He earned a bachelor’s degree in biology with a minor in chemistry, followed by a master’s degree in plant pathology, before completing his PhD at the University of Arkansas in Fayetteville.

Markell lives in Fargo, N.D., with his wife. They have twin daughters attending NDSU and a son in high school.

Where did you work before NDSU?

I was a research specialist while I was a student at the University of Arkansas, but this was my first job after graduating with my PhD in 2007.

What got you interested in this area of work?

When I was in college I had multiple majors. I was in engineering, then history and social sciences education. I bounced around until I found an ecology class. I loved the systems approach, and from there, plant pathology was a natural step. The science side really got me interested, and science for a purpose is a big part of why I’m a plant pathologist.

Tell us a bit about what you’re working on at NDSU.

My work is seasonal. Winter is meeting season, where we travel to grower and industry events to share research results. We also focus on writing for publications and extension. In the spring, we plan research projects, deciding what to plant and where. Most of our work evaluates the tools farmers use to manage diseases, whether that’s genetics or new chemicals. Summer is a mix of field research and monitoring how those tools are performing, along with communication and travel. In the fall, we focus on data analysis, writing and we usually propose new research before the cycle repeats and we go back into meeting season.

A project we’re working on, “Determination of rust virulence in sunflower,” is co-funded by Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA). Rust can significantly reduce yield. We’ve seen losses as high as 80 per cent, although that’s rare. More commonly, losses of 10 to 30 per cent can occur. We manage rust through fungicides and scouting, and genetic resistance. Our hope is that farmers can plant a hybrid resistant to rust and not have to worry. However, the challenge is that the pathogen can evolve to overcome the genetic resistance, making the hybrid susceptible to the new pathogen “race.” This is similar to how antibiotic resistance occurs to human pathogens and diseases.

This project looks at the rust pathogen across the north-central U.S. Great Plains, which is the same population across Manitoba. We’re studying its variability to determine which resistance genes are useful against rust in our region. We’re also looking at how the pathogen populations are related in other regions of North America. The goal is to monitor changes and ensure our genetic resistance remains effective. The last survey was done in 2012, so this is long overdue.

What can you say about the value of farmers providing funding and support to your organization?

Farmers know the areas they need help. Funding is a direct way of telling scientists what’s important and what we need to deliver. It also means farmers influence the direction of the science. When farmers and researchers work closely together, both sides get better. Developing that relationship is critical. Farmer funding also helps leverage additional support by showing the government how important the work is to farmers.

How does that farmer funding and support directly benefit farmers?

Farmers are good at identifying projects that will bring value. By funding research, they help ensure the work delivers the results they need. Because I’m in extension, I’m also able to share those results through meetings, presentations and articles. That communication piece is important.

I’m always impressed with how engaged the farming community is. Every farmer is running a complex business, yet they take the time to stay informed and influence agriculture in different ways. I really admire and appreciate that.

How do you spend your time outside of work?

I play musical instruments, including mandolin, guitar and Irish bouzouki, which is like a large mandolin. I also work out. Sports have always been a big part of my life. We recently started curling in a league, which has been humbling getting crushed by high school kids, and I enjoy mountain biking when I can.

What is the best part about your job?

Communicating with farmers and researchers. It’s connecting with people where my work can make a difference. I enjoy presenting, writing and putting together extension articles and alerts.

What are you excited about for the future of agriculture?

There’s a significant generational shift happening in both farming and science. My graduate students bring different skill sets and new ways of communicating. They’re part of the social media generation and I think will do a better job getting messages out. Farmers are changing in similar ways. The next generation will adapt quickly as agriculture evolves. It’s exciting to see younger farmers asking new kinds of questions.

To learn more about Sam Markell, visit NDSU’s website.

More Control, Less Rush: Using Cash Advances to Strengthen Marketing Decisions

The following article is a recap of “Smart Financing for Manitoba Farmers,” a presentation in our Roots to Results Webinar Series. The full webinar recording can be viewed here.

Farming is one of the most capital-intensive businesses in Canada. Seed, fuel, fertilizer and land costs go out months before crop revenue comes in. And while yields and markets can fluctuate, input costs are constant and high.

That’s why cash flow strategy matters as much as production strategy. In the final presentation of our Roots to Results Webinar Series, Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) COO Darcelle Graham shared how an Advance Payments Program (APP) cash advance from MCA can serve as a practical, flexible tool to strengthen marketing power and reduce borrowing costs.

Turn Cash Flow Pressure into Marketing Power

The APP provides access to capital based on up to 50 per cent of your anticipated or stored production value. That means you don’t have to sell grain just to cover spring bills.

Implementation

Map out your 12- to 18-month cash flow needs. If input or rent payments are driving early sales, consider whether an advance could bridge the gap and let you market when prices improve.

Capture Interest Savings That Stay on Your Farm

The federal government covers the interest on the first $100,000 advanced (or up to $500,000 for canola only in 2026). That can translate into thousands of dollars in savings compared to traditional borrowing.

Implementation

Compare your operating loan rate to the APP rate (prime minus 0.5 per cent on interest-bearing portions). Run the math: what would $4,000–$20,000 in interest savings mean for your bottom line?

Match Repayment to Grain Sales

Unlike traditional loans, there are no fixed monthly payments. You repay as you sell your crop, within an 18-month window.

Implementation

Align your marketing plan with repayment timelines. As you price grain, set aside advance repayment within 30 days of receiving payment to stay compliant and avoid penalties.

Use It as a Tool for Transitional Periods

You don’t need to own land to qualify. You must own the crop, having grown and marketed it. That makes it especially helpful for young or transitioning farmers.

Implementation

If you’re farming rented land or gradually taking over the operation, explore whether separate advances (where eligible) could support working capital during transition years.

Treat the Application Like a Business Agreement

The program is flexible, but it requires accountability. Security, crop insurance (or inventory proof) and signed documentation are mandatory.

Implementation

Before applying, read the terms and conditions carefully. Confirm crop insurance coverage, review your creditor priority agreements and double-check signatures to avoid processing delays.

Korey Peters, sunflower crop committee

WEB_Korey-Peters

Korey Peters farms near Randolph, MB, with his family at Herbsigwil Farms. Herb is his grandpa, Sig is his uncle and Will is his dad. Korey is a third-generation farmer, and the fourth generation is already on the farm full-time. Herbsigwil Farms grows wheat, canola, soybeans, corn and sunflowers.

Korey lives on the farm with his wife and their two children, who enjoy spending lots of time in the yard.

What motivated you to get into farming?

I was always working on the farm in the summers. I came back full time in 2011 when my uncle had slowed down a little, and I just never left.

What motivated you to get involved with Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA)?

We started growing sunflowers when we were looking to add another crop in our rotation, and someone I know approached me because MCA was looking for committee members after some delegates had termed out.

We chatted about it. It’s not a huge time commitment to be on a crop committee. I had been on a few boards not related to ag, so I had an idea how they run. I thought I’d get involved, and that’s how it started.

It’s been great to meet other farmers. Most farmers love talking farming, especially with other farmers from Manitoba. There are differences depending on where you farm and the weather from east to west, so it’s interesting to talk about what varieties we’re growing, diseases and pests and how others are managing them, and the differences we can apply to our own farm.

What does your role on the sunflower crop committee involve?

We meet quarterly. MCA is a research-oriented organization, so we make decisions about whether we think research dollars should be used on certain proposals. We review proposals from graduate students and researchers related to sunflowers, whether that involves disease, genetics, insects or other issues. Projects can range from one- to five-year timelines. Before I joined, the committee had started the process of bringing a sunflower confection variety to Manitoba, which is now in trials here.

How has being a sunflower crop committee delegate benefitted you?

It’s helped me realize how much work goes on behind the scenes by boards and committees like this. Since MCA amalgamated, I feel like it has been very purposefully driven. MCA has really figured out its purpose and focused on it, and the subcommittees feel the effects of that. We come up with ideas and continue to do the work in the background, then pass it to the board of directors, which makes the final decisions on where things are heading.

Is there a project or area of work you’re especially proud of being part of as a delegate?

The confectionary sunflower variety. MCA has brought a confectionary seed variety almost to market. It’s very close. One of our board members is growing quite a bit of it this year. It was grown in 2025, and there’s a larger acreage planned for 2026. We have a few companies looking at purchasing it, and we’re starting the process of figuring out the best way to market it going forward.

Is there anything you’d like farmer members to know about the work MCA is doing?

MCA is really pushing to reach all its members through newsletters, social media, emails and outreach. They’re trying to let everybody know all this amazing research is happening. Farmers are always looking for answers. We like to talk to each other for real-life experience on the farm. This is research done by farmers, for farmers. Getting that information out there and working hard to spread the word is very important.

Why do you think other people should get involved with MCA?

I think being involved is great for farmers. It’s important to be involved in a committee of some kind, whether it’s research like MCA or something else, and to find a way to give back to the farming community. We all use the resources that come from it. A lot of people wonder where their check-off dollars go but don’t always look into it. When you get involved, you realize the value of those dollars going to organizations like MCA.

What are you most excited about when it comes to the future of your farm?

Since I’ve been farming full-time, our farm has gone through quite a growth spurt. The third generation has grown the farm and worked really hard at it. We’re now in a position to maintain and improve our land going forward. Rather than focusing on expansion, we’re looking at refining and improving what we have. We’re in a comfortable spot to support our families living here while improving efficiencies.

Do you have any hobbies outside of farming?

I enjoy golf in the summer and beer league hockey in the winter. I also help coach my kids’ hockey and baseball teams.

What’s your go-to field meal during busy seasons?

I’m obviously a child of the ’80s. I love a good pizza pop, even if it’s cold. Wrap it in tin foil, put it on the exhaust of the tractor and it warms right back up!

What’s one thing people might be surprised to learn about you?

I was a high school music teacher for five years before coming back to farming full-time. My family is musical. My sister is a music teacher, and my brother was involved in music growing up. That’s what happens when your dad’s a farmer and your mom’s a voice and music teacher: you get both worlds.

Follow Korey on X @koreypeters.

2025 Sunflower Crop Survey Results

The Sunflower Crop Survey is led by the National Sunflower Association and carried out by a network of volunteer from universities, government, producers and industry, including Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA). Participating regions include Manitoba, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, Kansas, and Colorado, where data is collected on a number of variables and compiled to document sunflower growing conditions, pest challenges and yield. The survey is conducted on alternate years, with fall 2025 being the most recent.

Manitoba and U.S. Survey Overview:

191 Sunflower fields were samples across all participating regions. The following management practices were observed:

  • Sunflower type: 7% confection; 93% oilseed
  • Water Management: 2% irrigated; 98% dryland
  • Tillage: 24% conventional; 21% minimum; 55% no-till

The survey has a large focus on pest pressures. The cumulative pests that were monitored across all locations were as follows:

  • 34% of fields had blackbird damage
  • 11% of fields had seed maggot damage
  • 8% of fields had bud moth damage
  • 8% of fields had sunflower midge damage
  • 14% of fields had long-horned beetle damage. It is important to note that long-horned beetle has not been found in Manitoba during this survey, or in anecdotal scouting events, however there are fields sampled in this survey that are extremely close to the MB-ND border that had long-horned beetle (dectes) damage in both 2025 and 2023.

Manitoba Overview:

12 sunflower fields in 10 municipalities were sampled in Manitoba from the RM of Brokenhead to the RM of Two Borders:

  • Sunflower type: 100% oilseed
  • Water Management: 100% dryland
  • Tillage: 25% conventional; 67% minimum; 8% no-till
  • Row Spacing: 50% had 20” or narrower row spacing, 50% had 22” to 30” row spacing

Each field was surveyed in two locations and a small sample area of two rows by 25 feet was used to gather data in each of the two locations. Pests were recorded, full plants were assessed, and seed samples were taken.

The highest yield in a sampled area was 2,792 lb/ac.

The lowest yield in a sampled area was 983 lb/ac.

The average yield among all 12 fields sampled was 2,000 lb/ac.

Yield-Limiting Factors

  • Seven of the 12 fields were limited mainly by disease, in general.
  • One of the 12 fields was limited mainly by bird presence and feeding.
  • One of the 12 fields was limited mainly by row spacing, as it was a solid-seeded field. This was hard to measure yield on such a small scale with fewer plants per foot of row.
  • Three of the 12 fields were limited mainly by weed pressure, with one of them being specifically limited by kochia infestation. In the 12 fields, weed pressure was generally quite low and not at all a concern in 75% of the fields.
  • Secondary limitations in the 12 fields sampled included wildlife (i.e., elk), lodging, insect, sclerotinia and birds.

Disease Presence and Severity

Sclerotinia:

  • Sclerotinia basal stem rot was minor in all fields sampled. Half of the fields had no basal wilt present. One field had up to eight plants with basal wilt symptoms, which would be estimated at about 8% of the sample size in that field.
  • Sclerotinia mid-stalk rot presence was similar to basal stem rot. Eight fields had zero or just one plant infected; one field had six infections and another had seven infections; two fields had 10 or 12 plants infected, respectively.
  • Sclerotinia head rot were higher, in general. Half of the fields had four or less infected heads; three fields had 5-7 infected heads, one field had 10 infected heads, one field had 12 infected heads and one field had 22 infected heads. This last field did report the lowest yield as well, unsurprisingly.

Downy Mildew:

  • Low incidence among all fields, except one that had four affected plants

Phomopsis:

  • Six of the 12 fields had almost negligible one or zero plants with Phomopsis infections.
  • Five of the 12 fields had from six to 15 stalks infected with Phomopsis.
  • One field had 40 plants with Phomopsis infections, which was roughly 80% incidence in that location.

Phoma:

  • Incidence was much higher and present in relatively high numbers in each of the 12 fields, except for two that had zero incidence.
  • The three highest fields of incidence had 32, 42 and 46 plants with Phoma stem infections.

Rhizopus:

Rhizopus has not been a disease of concern in Manitoba, simply because it can largely go undetected. The last time the sunflower survey was conducted, in 2023, three of eight fields had Rhizopus in the sample set.

Rhizopus can be identified on a sunflower head by the presence of gray, fuzzy mycelium, usually viewed on the face and between developed seeds. The disease prefers warm, humid environments and most often originates via wounds on the back of the sunflower head. Infections do affect yield by limiting seed fill and potentially causing head drop in severe cases.

Rhizopus on sunflower head. Photo courtesy of North Dakota State University.

Sunflower Rust:

Sunflower rust was very minimal in 2025 and was found in four of the 12 fields at very minor severity in September. The highest severity was one field that exhibited 0.75% of leaf area on the top four leaves being affected by rust pustules.

Verticillium Wilt:

Verticillium wilt is also uncommon in sunflower fields in Manitoba, though it was found in the 2025 survey. Symptoms can include leaf mottle, or interveinal chlorosis, and a greenish discolouration on the stem, where further inspection is required. By splitting the stem at the base of the plant, discoloured vascular tissue is visible around the pith.

  • Three fields were found to have Verticillium wilt with five, six and 12 plants infected, respectively.

Insect Presence and Severity

Sunflower Midge:

  • Seven of the 12 fields had Sunflower Midge damage.
  • The field with the greatest damage had seven affected heads.

Sunflower Seed Maggot:

  • Three of 12 fields had Sunflower Seed Maggot damage.
  • Each of the three fields had one plant affected.

Sunflower Bud Moth:

  • Nine of 12 fields had Sunflower Bud Moth damage, specifically on the sunflower head.
  • The field with the greatest damage had 14 affected heads, followed by a field that had 10 affected heads.
  • The remaining seven fields had minor damage noted.

Blackbird Presence and Severity

Blackbird feeding was noted in five of the 12 fields sampled. Assessment is based on the area of the sunflower head with missing seed that has recognizably been fed on by birds. Seed is usually completely missing and sunflower seed shells may be found on or near the plant in question.

All four fields with damage noted were quite minor in the sampled areas, the greatest having about 6.35% of the total head area missing seed.

Other Yield Factors

Actual plant populations of sampled fields ranged from 12,200 to 24,400 plants per acre. Strangely enough, the lowest populated field also had the smallest head size, averaging about 5.75” in diameter. The field with largest head size overall was 8.45” diameter. Generally, head size was smaller in the sampled fields than an average year would see, but this may have been a result of dry growing conditions during head development.

Seed size was reported to be good to excellent and seed fill ranged from 70 – 99% across the 12 fields. Centre seed set was reasonable, but there were some fields that did have up to two inches of the head centre undeveloped, which drastically affects yield.

MCA would like to thank all 12 participants of the Sunflower Survey for allowing us to use your fields for this project. Also, thank you to Manitoba Agriculture oilseeds specialist Sonia Wilson and crop production extension specialist Callum Morrison for your help surveying several fields. Finally, thank you to Dr. Ahmed Abdelmagid, research scientist and oilseed pathologist at AAFC Morden, for surveying several fields and collecting various samples of sunflower diseases to understand the scope of disease presence in Manitoba.

Cheers to five years: Anniversary food and drink collaborations help MCA give back

When we started thinking about how we wanted to celebrate Manitoba Crop Alliance’s fifth anniversary, we knew we wanted to give back to our farmer members, industry partners and the broader agriculture community, who have all helped the organization become what it is today. After much consideration, we decided the best way to do that was with some special food and drink made from MCA crops grown right here in Manitoba.

The result was three unique and delicious anniversary collaborations:

Beer

Our anniversary beer was brewed in collaboration with Trans Canada Brewing Co., a mainstay in the Winnipeg craft brewing community. For the anniversary brew, we couldn’t have asked for a better partner than Trans Canada, which shares our belief in the importance of supporting local farmers, buying (and drinking) local and giving back to the community. The beer was produced using malt from Scythe Malting Co. in Springstein, MB, which is owned and operated by MCA director Jeffrey Stobbe-Wiebe and his family.

Our “Stronger Together” light lager was distributed to MCA delegates during the 2026 all delegates meeting in Brandon, handed out to attendees following the 2026 MCA AGM and also made available to all CropConnect attendees during the Farmer Saloon portion of the conference.

Bread

Our anniversary white pan bread was created by our friends and longtime collaborators at Cereals Canada. Given our strong, existing ties with Cereals Canada through our membership in the organization, and the important market development and access work they do on behalf of our farmer members, it was a natural partnership. The bread was distributed to all farmer members who attended the 2026 MCA AGM.

Coming Soon: Whisky

Our final collaboration is a special anniversary whisky produced with Winnipeg’s Patent 5 Distillery. The base spirit was made from a mixture of locally grown corn, wheat and barley for a unique, Made-in-Manitoba flavour. The anniversary whisky is currently aging in barrels, where it will remain for the next several years, with plans to bottle and release the final product in 2030 when we celebrate MCA’s 10th anniversary. We are sure it will be worth the wait!

Gallery: Behind the scenes at Trans Canada Brewing Co.

Meet Manitoba Crop Alliance’s 2025-26 post-secondary bursary recipients

MCA_2025-26 PS Bursary Recipients Graphic_X

Manitoba Crop Alliance (MCA) is proud to support agriculture’s next generation. MCA’s bursary program is designed to assist with the financial needs of students pursuing education in a field that will benefit the agriculture sector.

Six post-secondary students from Manitoba have been awarded with MCA 2025-26 bursaries valued at $2,000 each. The 2025-26 bursary recipients are Daniela Heinrichs from Clearwater, Marco Fanzago from Elm Creek, Evan Whetter from Alexander, Kayden Stewart from Rosser, Cohen Crammond from Austin, and Nolan Marginet from Treherne.

“Today’s students are agriculture’s future leaders, and we are proud to support the next generation as they continue their education,” says MCA chair Jonothan Hodson. “This year’s post-secondary bursary recipients all have deep roots in agriculture and a desire to broaden their knowledge. I look forward to seeing how they will advance our industry and give back to their communities.”

Bursary applicants needed to meet the following criteria:

  • Have completed a minimum of one year (two terms) of post-secondary education at the college or university level (diploma or degree) and are enrolled full-time for the 2025-26 school year in an agricultural program within Canada.
  • Have achieved a minimum cumulative grade point average (GPA) of 3.0.
  • Have an interest in wheat (spring or winter), corn, barley, flax or sunflower crops, or agriculture in general, as demonstrated in a brief, one-page letter.
  • Are from a farm that is a member in good standing with MCA.
  • Have not previously been awarded an MCA post-secondary bursary (past high school bursary recipients remain eligible for a post-secondary bursary).

An independent selection committee was contracted to evaluate the applicants based on their connection to or interest in agriculture, explanation of why they decided to enrol in an agriculture-related post-secondary program, how they hope to benefit the agriculture industry once they have graduated and are in the workforce, and their academics and writing skills.

This year, the selection committee included Melody Caron, the owner/director of independent crop production research company TapRoot Research Ltd., and Elizabeth Karpinchick, a registered professional agrologist working as an independent consultant for Tone Ag Consulting Ltd.

Caron started TapRoot Research Ltd. in 2022 and has been supporting varietal development, pesticide efficacy and fertility research in the Red River Valley and Carman, MB. Her background in soil science, agroecology and as a field biologist have all contributed to her interest and expertise in conducting field research in Manitoba. Caron and her husband have two children and operate a grain farm near Brunkild, MB, where they grow cereals, soybeans and canola.

Karpinchick specializes in field crop agronomy, soil testing, on-farm testing and organic crop production. She serves on the Agrologist Manitoba board of directors and is president of the St. Pierre Agricultural Society, the St. Pierre CDC and the Frog Follies Committee.

Thank you to the selection committee for evaluating the bursary applications and congratulations to the 2025-26 bursary recipients!

Meet the MCA 2025-26 bursary recipients

Rethinking Crop Insurance for your Farm

The following article is a recap of “Beyond Basic Coverage: Unlocking the Value of Crop Coverage Plus,” a presentation in our Roots to Results Webinar Series. The full webinar recording can be viewed here.

Risk management is, in part, about making sure one poor crop year doesn’t severely impact the overall trajectory of your farm.

During a recent webinar, Manitoba Agricultural Services Corporation’s (MASC) David Van Deynze and Scott Clayton asked farmers to think differently about crop insurance: not as protection for individual crops, but as protection for the farm as a whole.

Crop Coverage Plus shifts the focus from isolated losses to overall farm performance, offering higher coverage levels and, in some cases, meaningful premium savings for diversified operations. By recognizing how different crops succeed and struggle under the same conditions, whole-farm coverage aims to provide protection that matches the way Manitoba farms actually operate.

Shift from Crop-by-Crop to Whole-Farm Thinking

Crop Coverage Plus evaluates the combined value of all insured crops, allowing strong yields to offset weaker ones.

Implementation

Review your insurance decisions across your entire crop mix instead of one line item at a time.

Crop Diversity Can Unlock Better Protection

Farms with multiple crops may qualify for coverage levels up to 90 per cent, sometimes at a lower premium than standard 80 per cent coverage.

Implementation

If you’re growing three or more crops, ask your MASC insurance specialist to model your farm under Crop Coverage Plus.

Not All Crops Move Together — and That Matters

Some crops respond differently to heat, moisture or timing. Those differences reduce overall risk when measured at the farm level.

Implementation

Consider how crops like winter wheat or corn behave differently across seasons when planning rotations.

Fewer Claims, but Stronger Support When It Counts

While small, single-crop claims may be offset, farms tend to receive larger indemnities in years when most crops suffer.

Implementation

Decide whether your operation benefits more from frequent small payouts or stronger protection in difficult years.

Reseed Benefits Increase with Higher Coverage

Reseed payments are calculated as a percentage of coverage. Higher coverage means larger reseed support when conditions force a restart.

Implementation

Factor early-season weather risk into your insurance choice, especially in moisture-prone areas.

Top