corn Archives - Manitoba Crop Alliance

What exactly are corn, sunflowers and flax dealing with in this standing water and saturated soils?

Morgan Cott on July 2, 2026

By Morgan Cott, Agronomy Extension Specialist – Special Crops, Manitoba Crop Alliance

The crops we grow and work with in Manitoba do not generally do well in extended periods of flooding or saturated soils. Roots and growing points need oxygen to develop, so plant growth is delayed in these conditions. Disease development is also escalated in wet, hot, humid conditions, so that is another impending threat down the road.

Timing has not been ideal for corn. If you have puddling or any degree of flooding or standing water, corn at V5 or smaller is at vulnerable staging for survival. The growing point remains below ground until V6 and I think most corn crops were moving into the V6 at the time of the June 23 heavy rainfalls. It can be very stressful for a crop to have excessive moisture arrive as the growing point emerges from underground. No matter where the growing point is in the plant, if it is below the waterline, conditions become anaerobic and it cannot “breathe.” While photosynthesis can still be occurring in parts of the plant above the waterline, root growth is restricted below the waterline and all nutrient and water intake is hindered.

At this point in the season, I want any standing water to recede quickly and I also want the air temperature to stay mild during that period so there is no rapid growth or additional stress. Already, a week after the heavy rains, there is very visible rapid growth in corn fields across southern Manitoba.

Partially flooded corn field. Photo by Eric Tyschinski, MCA summer student.

Sunflowers are equally stressed in anaerobic conditions. Even though their water use is very high, if the plant cannot breathe, it cannot grow. In these times of excess moisture, we don’t want the crop to be in standing water for longer than three days, and cloudy, mild temperatures are best to keep other stresses to a minimum. Unfortunately, sclerotinia development is a significant threat in these conditions, and as the fields dry out, humidity will be high and conditions will be favourable to development, so basal and stalk infections could become severe this year. Keep an eye on stressed sunflower fields to ensure new growth is still coming and plants are still photosynthesizing.

Effects of excess moisture in flax are exactly what we would guess: it has a low tolerance to severe stresses and will not survive long. The estimate for flax in standing water is about three days before the crop really starts to struggle and yield will be affected. Fortunately, stem root diseases are only a minor issue in flax crops and the wet soil conditions won’t affect this crop as much as it would others with regards to disease intolerance.

With all crops, check for new growth regularly to determine how efficiently the crop is still working and developing. Dig up a few plants to assess root growth. In saturated soils, roots don’t need to grow downward to find moisture, so the benefits of a strong root system later in the season might be diminished. Root health may suffer, which will be identifiable by the colour of the root. These are all good assessments to continue until the soil water subsides, the field starts to dry out and the crop can grow as intended.

Partially flooded flax field. Photo by Eric Tyschinski, MCA summer student.

Helpful Resources:

The Impact of Mid-Season Excess Moisture
Purdue University: Effects of Flooding or Ponding on Corn Prior to Tasseling

What is the difference between GDD, CHU and RM? Why and when are they each important?

Morgan Cott on June 1, 2026

By Morgan Cott, Agronomy Extension Specialist – Special Crops, Manitoba Crop Alliance

This is such a great question and I understand the reasons for asking. First of all, I think it is understood that GDD & CHU both basically measure how efficiently a day’s heat will benefit a growing or developing crop. One main difference between the two measurements is that CHU does account for extremely high temperatures (>30^oC) that negatively affect crop development. CHU also looks at both the nighttime low temperatures (4.4^oC as the base) and daytime temperatures between only 10^oC (base) and 30^oC (optimum ceiling).

GDD has historically been used to help estimate certain agronomic events like insect emergence, weed emergence, frost-free days and specific crop staging. My understanding is that CHU is used more for maturity than for the ability to accurately predict these different timelines throughout the season. This might be why certain seed companies use CHU and RM for maturity ranking and GDD for staging references.

Pride Seeds is an example of this, because they break down maturity with both CHU and RM, in addition to two key reproductive stages in GDD accumulation.

When calculating GDD or CHU, you will start from the day after corn was planted. It takes from 100 – 120 GDD for corn to emerge following planting, which is in ideal conditions, including soil moisture and soil temperature, which were variable this spring (and every spring). Start your calculations from day 1 until the day of emergence and see if that fits the above. Now that corn has emerged and is actively growing in your current conditions, continue to monitor accumulating GDD with the following formula. This will give you a head start on expectations during the growing season. When to expect pollination, for example. Note that this GDD accumulation in relation to corn staging is all in relation to each individual hybrid. A shorter season hybrid will need fewer GDD or CHU to reach black layer than a longer season hybrid, of course.

Helpful Resources:

How much 10-34-0 can be applied with my corn seed?

Morgan Cott on May 5, 2026

Oddly, I have had this conversation more this winter/spring than ever before. On paper, there is a finite answer. Anecdotally, there are a few different options and it is all dependent on soil type and soil conditions, moisture, etc.

First of all, side-banding any type of fertilizer is much safer than placing it with the seed. Some fertilizers are safe in certain quantities with the seed, but very few. Side-banding is much safer and provides quick access to the roots. Midrow banding is the safest method, but roots take that much longer to access the fertilizer row, which negates the “starter” effect. The other factor that indicates the level of safety is soil moisture; the drier the soil, the more risky it is to place any fertilizer with or near the seed.

I’m guilty of thinking that fertilizer toxicity to the seed is mainly due to the nitrogen content and a result of ammonia burn. Salt injury is actually more common and affects germination and early season growth, so applying fertilizers that have a low salt index in closer proximity to the seed is best, if any has to be close to the seed at all. Bonus points if there is good soil moisture at the time of fertilization.

As I mentioned, on paper there are defined rates of 10-34-0 that can safely be applied in-furrow with corn on 30” rows. This table shows those rates and placement that will help to avoid salt injury to the corn crop.

Table: Amount of 10-34-0 (gal/acre) to help avoid salt injury to corn grown in 30” rows.

After having some discussions with Manitoba corn farmers on various soil types, I did get some reasonable responses explaining increasing rates in heavier, wetter soils. But more importantly, decreasing the above rates in dry and/or lighter soils. These were purely anecdotal and not research-based.

I recommend being very conservative in 10-34-0 rates if you are new to trying this method of application, and especially if you are planting in dry conditions and/or coarse soil textures. Start small and have many conversations with your peers on their experiences with various rates of 10-34-0 in-furrow. Use that information to make a conservative decision of your own.

Remember, start your season with success and make smart choices. Do not make decisions that could get your crop off to a bad start. We live in Manitoba – Mother Nature is hard enough on us in spring.

2025 Manitoba Corn Disease Survey Results

Morgan Cott on January 30, 2026

Anne Kirk, Manitoba Agriculture
Morgan Cott, Manitoba Crop Alliance
Simon Huang, Manitoba Agriculture

A corn disease survey was conducted across Manitoba in September of 2025. Crop disease surveys are important for documenting the severity and geographical distribution of various diseases. Results from disease surveys provide warning about new diseases and help to prioritize where future research is needed.

Methods

A total of 54 fields were surveyed across Manitoba to document the prevalence (% of fields having infection) and incidence (average % of plants showing infection within infected fields) of various corn diseases. Field were surveyed in September around the beginning of crop maturity.

Plants were visually assessed for the presence of Goss’s wilt (Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis), common rust (Puccinia sorghi), common smut (Ustilago maydis), head smut (Sphacelotheca reiliana), and stalk rot. Holcus spot (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) was recorded in some but not all fields. In each field, 50 plants were surveyed in a “W” pattern, where the five points of the “W” were at least 50 paces apart and 100 m from field edges. The presence or absence of disease was noted for each of the 50 sampled plants per field, except for Goss’s wilt and holcus spot. Goss’s wilt and holcus spot were simply recorded as present or absent for each field.

Results
At crop maturity Goss’s wilt was found in 54% of the fields sampled, making it the most common disease found in the fall survey. Holcus spot was found in the majority of fields surveyed in the central region, but prevalence is not reported as all surveyors were not assessing plants for holcus spot. Head smut, common rust, stalk rot, and common smut were found in 33%, 11%, 7% and 6% of fields surveyed, respectively (Table 1).

Table 1. Results of the 2025 corn disease survey. Prevalence (% of fields having infection) and incidence (average % of plant showing infection within infected fields) for each region and for all fields surveyed.

Region	Common Rust	Common Smut	Head Smut	Stalk Rot	Anthracnose Stalk Rot	Goss’s Wilt
Central (35 fields)
% Prevalence	14	9	29	6	0	71
% Incidence	17	8	3	13	0	n/a
Eastern (9 fields)
% Prevalence	0	0	22	11	0	44
% Incidence	0	0	8	2	0	n/a
Interlake (2 fields)
% Prevalence	50	0	0	50	0	0
% Incidence	10	0	0	6	0	n/a
Southwest (8 fields)
% Prevalence	0	0	75	0	0	0
% Incidence	0	0	5	0	0	n/a
Manitoba (54 fields)
% Prevalence	11	6	33	7	0	54
% Incidence	16	8	4	9	0	n/a

Acknowledgements
This survey was supported by Manitoba Agriculture and Manitoba Crop Alliance. Thank you to the grower co-operators who allowed for their fields to be surveyed and provided surveyors with field information.

Contributed by Anne Kirk, Cereal Crop Specialist with Manitoba Agriculture.

Managing Bt Resistant European Corn Borer

Morgan Cott on April 3, 2025

European corn borer larvae

European corn borer (ECB) has long been a pest of Manitoba corn crops, but it is not only a nuisance to corn – crops like potatoes and hemp are affected as well. The larval stages of the insect are most economically significant due to their tunneling (boring) capabilities which disrupt the flow of nutrients and water, and the integrity of the stalk. Yields can certainly be affected by ECB presence, around 3-5% yield decrease being possible in standard incidences (5-9 bu/acre in a 175 bushel crop) and increasing in more significant infestations.

Until Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) traits were introduced to corn in Canada and the United States in 1996, corn farmers would rely on cultural practices and insecticidal control when economic thresholds were met. Cultural practices include crop rotation, residue management – destroying stalks where larvae overwinter successfully, and tillage that buries residue deep enough that larvae cannot survive. Insecticidal control is difficult due to timing between egg hatch and the boring phase. Diligent scouting to monitor egg hatch progress is extremely important to time when most eggs have hatched and larvae have not begun entering the stalk tissue yet. Once larvae reach the 3^rd instar stage (7-10 days following hatch), they begin to bore into the stalk, and rarely resurface, rendering insecticide applications ineffective.

The introduction of Bt hybrids allowed farmers to not rely so heavily on residue management and insecticide application. Farmers were able to choose a fitting Bt-traited hybrid for their farm and had to match that hybrid with a refuge, or non-Bt, hybrid in 20% (or more) of the field in a block, strip or perimeter method. In more recent years, seed companies have come out with a 5% refuge system, called refuge-in-a-bag, making the system a lot easier for farmers to adhere to.

Unfortunately, non-compliance with pesticide requirements weakens the system and creates an opening for resistance. While the Bt trait is very strong, there is a small portion of the ECB population that are naturally resistant to the trait that controls the rest of the population. If farmers were to plant 100% Bt hybrids, those resistant populations would thrive and reproduce, eventually being the only population remaining.

BT CORN 101 – Manage Resistance Now

HOW RESISTANCE DEVELOPS – Manage Resistance Now

HOW TO MANAGE INSECT RESISTANCE IN YOUR BT CORN – Manage Resistance Now

MANAGING INSECT RESISTANCE VIA REFUGE PLANTING – Manage Resistance Now

Managing resistance on-farm can feel daunting, but it is very straightforward. Best management practices to avoid European corn borer resistance to Bt traits include:

Scout for pests and damage
Rotate crops and traits
Plant a refuge
Manage with insecticides
Keep accurate records

If there is a suspected case of ECB resistance in a Bt corn field, the following should be monitored to identify the issue:

Scout – both Bt and non-Bt corn for damage
Field Investigation – verify trait(s) present, evaluate presence and damage caused by ECB, rule out external reasons for damage
Contact Seed Company – seed company representative must be informed if ECB damage is found in Bt-traited crop, where it is determined the pest is resistant
Best Management Practices
Collect Insects – the seed company will likely arrange for live ECB samples to be taken from affected field(s)
Resistance Mitigation – if resistance is confirmed, farmer will be notified of next steps (see Managing Resistance in your Bt Corn)

Resources have been developed to help farmers, agronomists and seed companies identify issues in Bt corn fields as resistance incidents have occurred in Canada. Canadian Corn Pest Coalition is a group of industry members that work to develop extension and support to Canadian farmers and industry as insect issues arise. The CCPC has extensive resources available on their website on this specific topic, as well as other insect pests in corn. It is important for members of the corn industry to be educated on pest pressures that could turn into serious resistance incidents. Together we can improve the longevity of Bt traits so farmers can continue to use them safely and effectively.

Act Now ECB Campaign – Canadian Corn Pest Coalition

Contact your provincial Extension Entomologist (John Gavloski, Manitoba Agriculture) or MCA’s Agronomy Extension Specialist – Special Crops (Morgan Cott) for further information on European corn borer resistance, what to do to avoid it, and how to determine if you see possible resistance.

Phantom Yield Loss

Morgan Cott on December 4, 2024

Phantom Yield Loss – A phenomenon related to yield loss with little to no explanation why, aside from letting the grain dry naturally, prior to harvest.

Farmers who have to pause harvest, after opening a field, do record decreased yields when they return to continue combining. A few things come to mind when considering what the losses are a result of. Could it be ear drop? Or lodging is a common occurrence, the longer the crop stands in the field and is exposed to wildlife, snow, or wind. Another consideration is that as the grain dries in the field, it does loosen from the cob and can fall to the ground when disturbed. Low moisture grain is also susceptible to cracking or breakage at harvest, resulting in losses.

Speaking to Manitoba farmers, it appears that phantom yield loss is caused by none of the above. All the obvious culprits (ear drop, lodging, kernel shattering) can be accounted for and there are yield penalties beyond these factors, still.

Purdue University performed research on this topic in the early 90’s – before the phenomenon even had a name. The project looked at three hybrids over the course of four years and measured kernel dry weight until physiological maturity and again after maturity until they were ready for harvest. The study found that kernel dry weight increased until reaching physiological maturity, which occurred at about 25% moisture for all three hybrids. Following maturity, during the dry down period, kernel dry weight decreased by an average of 1.1% for every one per cent decrease in grain moisture content. This is an average across three hybrids in the four years of study. There was one year where none of the hybrids experienced any significant changes in kernel dry weight. The “bottom line” of the project is that there is a potential average 1% yield loss per point decrease in grain moisture content. That is to say that if a field is left to naturally dry down 5 moisture points following physiological maturity, there is a potential +/- 5% yield loss.

So, how does this occur and why? We now know that this is part of the drying process, but why is so much dry matter being lost as the grain dries a small amount?

Quite simply, physiological maturity occurs and each kernel develops a “black layer” where it connects to the cob and had gained access to nutrients and water throughout the season. Once black layer is achieved, grain continues to use up the starch and sugar reserves, which decreases kernel dry weight and quality. Grain is typically alive following black layer until it has dried down to around 15% moisture, so it is not surprising that this process results in loss of dry matter.

Unfortunately, it is impossible to predict losses as a result of this phenomenon. Factors affecting losses include harvest timing, soil type, hybrid/genetics, and of course, environmental factors. That being said, it is difficult to predict what genetics are most susceptible to respiration losses following black layer, so that isn’t something that would normally factor into hybrid choices. Earlier harvest timing is the best way to avoid significant losses, in this case. As mentioned, losses are impossible to predict, but measuring drying costs against the alternate potential yield loss is key in finding the best management practice for your farm.

Holcus Spot

Morgan Cott on November 8, 2024

What is holcus spot?

Holcus spot on corn leaf

A bacterial leaf disease affecting mainly corn crops, though it can overwinter in both monocot and dicot species. Holcus spot begins as a water-soaked spot on lower leaves and develops into small (1/4 to 1/8 “ in diameter), circular to elliptical, white to tan lesions. Lesions commonly develop a brown margin and sometimes a light halo is visible around the lesions. In severe infections, holcus spot can cause significant lesions on plant leaves, though it is more common to have minor spotting, covering less than 5% of a single leaf’s surface.

Conditions for Development

Holcus infections follow typical Manitoba spring conditions. This includes high winds and heavy rains, followed by extended moisture and warm summer temperatures (24C – 30C). The bacteria is interesting because it infects the leaf via wounding, but it doesn’t need a wound for development. The pathogen also does not spread from an infected leaf to a healthy leaf, as in many other leaf diseases.

Disease Management

The holcus spot pathogen lives and overwinters on crop residues. Best management practices to gain control of the pathogen are crop rotation and tillage. As a bacterial pathogen, fungicides will have no effect on the disease.

Fortunately, holcus spot affects a very small area of each infected leaf and photosynthesis of the green leaf material is still very effective. This is a concern in more disruptive leaf diseases or killing frosts that affect large areas of each leaf and photosynthesis is allocated to a small area or none at all. As a result of the small area affected, yield is not penalized and holcus spot is more of an aesthetic disease than a concern for farmers.

Don’t get confused…

Holcus spot infections are relatively uncommon. It is easy to see them and be unsure of what it means because lesions are most often minute and don’t draw attention.

In the rare occasion that the disease does grab attention, lesions can be confused with drift of a contact herbicide, like diquat (image below), or fertilizer burn. Key tips to determine if it could be fertilizer injury would be to ask the farmer or applicator if anything was applied recently or in the sprayer tank. If there is a possibility of herbicide drift, there will be a clear pattern in the area that would have gotten “hit”. The lesions would likely be worst along the outer rows and lessen the further into the field you look. Early in the season, injury would not grow with the plant and new leaves would be injury-free.

Diquat drift on corn leaf

The Impact of Mid-Season Excess Moisture

Morgan Cott on July 3, 2024

It is well-known that spring weather in Manitoba is unpredictable. Farmers endure drought conditions one season and excess moisture the next, never knowing for sure what is ahead. These dubious conditions make crop planning particularly difficult because no one knows what extremes of moisture crops may or may not have to grow through that season.

Generally, crops should endure excess moisture fairly well in early summer, when they are actively growing vegetatively, and environmental conditions are usually conducive to evaporation. The growth curve is quite steep during this time, especially in the large-sized crops like corn and sunflower and their water uptake is generous if conditions are good. Flax is not going to be a crop that tolerates “wet feet,” and it will be evident if it is in standing water for extended periods.

Corn

Corn that is past V6 staging has the growing point above ground, so flooding at this stage isn’t quite as detrimental as it would be at earlier stages. Remember that where there is standing water, there is no oxygen exchange and living cells cannot survive without it for very long. Ideally, conditions do not get too hot (crop stress) and evaporation and/or water drainage can happen quickly. Depending on how many times the flooded areas have been flooded this season, this influences the ability of the crop to “bounce back.” Root death is possible in this scenario and warm, dry soils will be required to generate new root growth. New root growth is possible in corn in these situations, but the new growth will extend horizontally, which leads to a few implications with nutrient uptake and plant stability.

In younger plants, V5 or smaller, being waterlogged for four days would be a maximum time span to survive and recover. It is harder to determine what that is for larger plants that are growing much more quickly, especially if there have been multiple heavy precipitation events that have left fields saturated and/or puddled. It is also exceedingly difficult to determine what nitrogen losses may be, and even more so when top-dress applications have occurred recently. At this stage and in the days ahead, it would be very important to keep an eye out for nitrogen deficiency symptoms. Corn nitrogen uptake is about 60 per cent of total uptake from the V8 to silking stages, so losing access to nitrogen via leaching or denitrification could seriously impact yield.

Sunflower

Sunflowers are growing rapidly in July and moving quickly into the reproductive stages. At this time, the crop can be using up to ¹/₃ inch of water each day. It is hard to believe that with this excessive water use that the crop wouldn’t manage saturated soils very well, but the roots do still need to breathe. Photosynthesis also slows down while stomata remain open in wet conditions, which slows plant development. In flooded conditions, sunflowers may have a tolerance for about three-plus days in an anaerobic environment. During those conditions and following, crop recovery is better with cloudy and cool-warm weather rather than hot and sunny weather.

Sunflowers are also very susceptible to stalk diseases during this vegetative growth, including sclerotinia basal rot. Sclerotinia infections can occur anytime between early vegetative stages through to seed fill and generally need precipitation to spread their spores. It is an important consideration for farmers and agronomists and recommended to know the high risk of disease that the crop carries in wet environments.

Flax

Flax has the lowest tolerance to flooding of the three specified crops. It is a small, shallow-rooted crop that does not adapt well to extreme conditions, nor does it have a need for high amounts of water to grow. If it remains in standing water for longer than three days, flax will become stunted, yellow and there will be a high risk of yield loss.

Flax requires the bulk of its water during flowering and seed fill, at roughly 0.28 inches/day. It is also known that dirty (weedy) flax fields use water much less efficiently than clean flax fields. The one benefit to flax in wet fields is that it is not as susceptible to stem diseases as most other Manitoba oilseeds, therefore wet conditions are not a matter of concern with regards to yield or quality loss due to disease.